Daniel Elahi Galan vs Tomas Machac — Sarasota CH Semi-final

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL3
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Galan D.
6-4 6-1
Machac T.
Galan D.
662
Machac T.
410

Daniel Elahi Galan defeated Tomas Machac 6-4 6-1 in the Sarasota CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galan D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Galan D.Machac T.
—
Serve
12
—
Return
48

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Galan D.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.3
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galan D.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
90
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
98
Break points won·Dominant
21
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galan D.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Machac T.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.6Clay Elo 1492
Surface ELO
8.4+291 Clay Elo edge
0.9Overall Elo 1531
ELO gap
9.1Overall Elo 1866
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
8.3
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
5.9
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65