Nerman Fatic vs Filip Peliwo — Split CH Qualifying Round 1

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
BIH5
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Filip Peliwo
POL
Filip Peliwo
#509ATP
1234ELO
1252Clay ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Fatic N.
6-4 6-0
Peliwo F.
Fatic N.
662
Peliwo F.
400

Nerman Fatic defeated Filip Peliwo 6-4 6-0 in the Split CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nerman Fatic came in ranked #396, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Peliwo F.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Peliwo F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Peliwo F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
0
Break points saved·Dominant
63
23
Break points won·Dominant
36
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
10
Tiebreaks·Even
35
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Peliwo F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
2.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Zuk K.[6]
Serdarusic N.[10]
2-66-46-3
Fatic N.[5]
Hassan B.[11]
6-43-66-3
Sweeny D.[4]
Prihodko O.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.[3]
Torres J.[7]
7-57-62
Ymer E.[2]
Lazarov A.[8]
6-46-4
Albot R.[1]
Jahn J.
6-37-5
Q1
Zuk K.[6]
Rehberg M.
6-46-3
Albot R.[1]
Vanshelboim E.
7-646-1
Serdarusic N.[10]
Travaglia S.
6-36-4
Cazaux A.[3]
Tonejc V.
6-36-1
Prihodko O.
Mccabe J.[9]
6-36-3
Hassan B.[11]
Mikrut L.
7-57-65
Fatic N.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-46-0
Sweeny D.[4]
Simundza J.
6-36-3
Torres J.[7]
Markovina D.
6-16-2
Ymer E.[2]
Nagal S.
6-26-4
Jahn J.
Molleker R.[12]
6-34-66-2
Lazarov A.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-36-2