Enzo Couacaud vs Denis Kudla — Sarasota CH Round of 32

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Couacaud E.
5-1
Kudla D.
Couacaud E.
5–
Kudla D.
1–

Enzo Couacaud advanced when Denis Kudla retired 5-1 in the Sarasota CH round of 32. Enzo Couacaud extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosQ1clayEnzo Couacaud7-5 7-6(2)

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Even
47
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
90
Break points won·Slight edge
29
19
Deciding sets·Even
77
81
Tiebreaks·Even
29
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kudla D.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.8
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65