Arthur Cazaux vs Mattia Bellucci — Split CH Round of 32

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1703Clay ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Mattia Bellucci
ITA7
Mattia Bellucci
#80ATP
1720ELO
1610Clay ELO
$587kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWLL
Cazaux A.
6-3 7-5
Bellucci M.
Cazaux A.
672
Bellucci M.
350

Arthur Cazaux defeated Mattia Bellucci 6-3 7-5 in the Split CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mattia Bellucci came in ranked #80.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bellucci M.

Bellucci M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Bellucci M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Bellucci M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
65
60
Break points saved·Even
97
96
Break points won·Clear edge
27
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Bellucci M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+93 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1610
6.4Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1720
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cazaux A.Bellucci M.
Freshness·
—
100

Bellucci M.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.
Gombos N.[3]
7-627-69
Semi-finals
Piros Z.
Oconnell C.[1]
6-26-4
Gombos N.[3]
Polmans M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Misolic F.[6]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Valkusz M.
7-6106-3
Piros Z.
Albot R.
7-655-76-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Prizmic D.
6-27-5
R16
Polmans M.
Ajdukovic D.
7-657-65
Gombos N.[3]
Zuk K.
6-33-67-66
Piros Z.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-61
Prizmic D.
Cazaux A.
7-56-2
Misolic F.[6]
Ymer E.
4-67-667-61
Valkusz M.
Maestrelli F.
6-21-66-2
Albot R.
Guinard M.
7-56-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-3
R32
Piros Z.
Marozsan F.[4]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-13-66-1
Valkusz M.
Klein L.[5]
3-66-37-65
Maestrelli F.
Medjedovic H.
7-636-1
Misolic F.[6]
Ionel N.
6-36-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Sweeny D.
7-656-2
Ajdukovic D.
Ivanovski K.
6-736-16-1
Ymer E.
Coppejans K.
3-66-36-3
Zuk K.
Navone M.
6-47-68
Albot R.
Uchida K.[8]
6-17-5
Guinard M.
Debru G.
4-66-26-4
Cazaux A.
Bellucci M.[7]
6-37-5
Prizmic D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
4-66-36-4
Fatic N.
Furness E.
6-37-5
Mochizuki S.
Mayot H.
6-21-66-2
Polmans M.
Rodionov J.[2]
6-44-66-3