Elmar Ejupovic vs Facundo Bagnis — Leon CH Round of 16

Leon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
hard
ARG2
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1513Hard ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Ejupovic E.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Bagnis F.
Ejupovic E.
6362
Bagnis F.
4631

Elmar Ejupovic defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Leon CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Elmar Ejupovic closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ejupovic E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ejupovic E.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
40%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ejupovic E.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
7
54
Break points saved·Even
88
92
Break points won·Dominant
1
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
0
89
Tiebreaks·Even
3
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ejupovic E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bagnis F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.6
Minutes 14d
8.0
0.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ficovich J.[8]
6-757-667-63
Semi-finals
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-657-64
Ficovich J.[8]
Dougaz A.
3-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Ficovich J.[8]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-633-66-3
Neuchrist M.[7]
Ejupovic E.
4-66-47-64
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Bellier A.[3]
6-13-66-3
Dougaz A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-3
R16
Bellier A.[3]
Walton A.
7-617-65
Mejia N.
Crawford O.
7-667-64
Neuchrist M.[7]
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Lock B.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.
Olivo R.[4]
6-26-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Tirante T.[6]
4-67-626-4
Ficovich J.[8]
Atmane T.
6-44-67-5
Ejupovic E.
Bagnis F.[2]
6-43-66-3
R32
Mejia N.
Escoffier A.[5]
6-16-736-3
Yunchaokete B.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[2]
Jung J.
4-66-36-2
Atmane T.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-16-2
Ejupovic E.
Zhu E.
6-36-4
Neuchrist M.[7]
Langmo C.
4-67-656-4
Bellier A.[3]
Comesana F.
7-623-66-4
Crawford O.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-33-66-3
Dougaz A.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-4
Olivo R.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-1
Lock B.
Yevseyev D.
7-57-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Mansouri S.
7-646-2
Walton A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.[8]
Sachko V.
6-36-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Chappell N.
6-14-66-2
Tirante T.[6]
Galarneau A.
2-67-56-2