Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Mateus Alves — Sarasota CH Round of 32

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
BRA
Mateus Alves
#455ATP
1245ELO
1247Clay ELO
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-4 7-6
Alves M.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6782
Alves M.
4660

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Mateus Alves 6-4 7-6 in the Sarasota CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Alves M.

Alves M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Alves M.
24
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Alves M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 152). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Alves M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
77
Break points won·Dominant
62
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Alves M.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 29 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
10.0+494 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1247
10.0Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1245
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
4.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Alves M.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
78

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest · Alves M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 38 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65