Zsombor Piros vs Radu Albot — Split CH Quarter-final

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Radu Albot
MDA
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1440Clay ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
Piros Z.
7-6 5-7 6-3
Albot R.
Piros Z.
77562
Albot R.
65731

Zsombor Piros defeated Radu Albot 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Split CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120, defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Albot R.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Albot R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Albot R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
46
Break points saved·Even
84
85
Break points won·Clear edge
32
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
76
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Albot R.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+180 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Clay Elo 1440
8.3Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1453
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
8.7
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Albot R.
Freshness·Dominant
54
93

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.
Gombos N.[3]
7-627-69
Semi-finals
Piros Z.
Oconnell C.[1]
6-26-4
Gombos N.[3]
Polmans M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Misolic F.[6]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Valkusz M.
7-6106-3
Piros Z.
Albot R.
7-655-76-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Prizmic D.
6-27-5
R16
Polmans M.
Ajdukovic D.
7-657-65
Gombos N.[3]
Zuk K.
6-33-67-66
Piros Z.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-61
Prizmic D.
Cazaux A.
7-56-2
Misolic F.[6]
Ymer E.
4-67-667-61
Valkusz M.
Maestrelli F.
6-21-66-2
Albot R.
Guinard M.
7-56-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-3
R32
Piros Z.
Marozsan F.[4]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-13-66-1
Valkusz M.
Klein L.[5]
3-66-37-65
Maestrelli F.
Medjedovic H.
7-636-1
Misolic F.[6]
Ionel N.
6-36-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Sweeny D.
7-656-2
Ajdukovic D.
Ivanovski K.
6-736-16-1
Ymer E.
Coppejans K.
3-66-36-3
Zuk K.
Navone M.
6-47-68
Albot R.
Uchida K.[8]
6-17-5
Guinard M.
Debru G.
4-66-26-4
Cazaux A.
Bellucci M.[7]
6-37-5
Prizmic D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
4-66-36-4
Fatic N.
Furness E.
6-37-5
Mochizuki S.
Mayot H.
6-21-66-2
Polmans M.
Rodionov J.[2]
6-44-66-3