Gabriel Diallo vs Facundo Diaz Acosta — Sarasota CH Round of 32

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gabriel Diallo
CAN
Gabriel Diallo
#93ATP
1716ELO
1629Clay ELO
$480kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#110ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
Diallo G.
3-6 6-2 7-6
Diaz Acosta F.
Diallo G.
36772
Diaz Acosta F.
62651

Gabriel Diallo defeated Facundo Diaz Acosta 3-6 6-2 7-6 in the Sarasota CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Gabriel Diallo came in ranked #93.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diallo G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Diaz Acosta F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Diallo G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Diallo G.Diaz Acosta F.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diallo G.Diaz Acosta F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
64
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
89
Break points won·Slight edge
24
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
67
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
68
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diallo G.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Diaz Acosta F.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8Clay Elo 1629
Surface ELO
4.2+40 Clay Elo edge
6.8Overall Elo 1716
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1681
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.9
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diallo G.Diaz Acosta F.
Freshness·Dominant
89
53

Diallo G.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Diaz Acosta F.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65