Casper Ruud vs Joao Sousa — Estoril Round of 16

Estoril · ATP · Round of 16
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
POR
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Ruud C.
4-6 6-2 6-2
Sousa J.
Ruud C.
4662
Sousa J.
6221

Casper Ruud defeated Joao Sousa 4-6 6-2 6-2 in the Estoril round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in leading the head-to-head 3–0. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-16GenevaFclayCasper Ruud7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(1)
2019-02-25Sao PauloR16clayCasper Ruud6-3 6-4
2019-02-18Rio de JaneiroR16clayCasper Ruud6-3 3-6 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Sousa J.
54
Serve
—
69
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Sousa J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Sousa J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
35
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
91
Break points won·Dominant
75
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
48
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sousa J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
9.0
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Sousa J.
Freshness·
98
—

Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ruud C.[1]
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-36-1
Ruud C.[1]
Halys Q.
6-43-67-62
Quarter-finals
Ruud C.[1]
Baez S.[5]
6-36-0
Cecchinato M.
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
7-57-65
Halys Q.
Thiem D.
6-16-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-56-2
R16
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Rodionov J.
6-06-1
Baez S.[5]
Cachin P.
6-47-62
Zapata Miralles B.
Hurkacz H.[2]
6-776-46-2
Cecchinato M.
Fognini F.
4-66-36-3
Ruud C.[1]
Sousa J.
4-66-26-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Van Assche L.
6-37-5
Thiem D.
Shelton B.[8]
6-26-2
Halys Q.
Bautista Agut R.[4]
7-657-5
R32
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Nardi L.
6-46-1
Cecchinato M.
Schwartzman D.[7]
6-37-68
Cachin P.
Tseng C.
6-46-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Rocha H.
6-46-2
Halys Q.
Borges N.
6-36-4
Baez S.[5]
Albot R.
7-57-63
Van Assche L.
Sousa P.
6-756-36-1
Shelton B.[8]
Lestienne C.
7-57-5
Fognini F.
Giannessi A.
6-26-1
Thiem D.
Ofner S.
3-66-36-4
Rodionov J.
Ramos A.
3-66-16-4
Sousa J.
Zeppieri G.
6-41-66-3