Renzo Olivo vs Jose Rubin Statham — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Renzo Olivo
ARG4
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
NZL
Jose Rubin Statham
39 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Olivo R.
7-5 6-3
Statham J.
Olivo R.
762
Statham J.
530

Renzo Olivo defeated Jose Rubin Statham 7-5 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Renzo Olivo came in defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Renzo Olivo closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Statham J.

Statham J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Statham J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
5.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Olivo R.Statham J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
8
0
Break points saved·Even
33
33
Break points won·Clear edge
15
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
27
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
41
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Olivo R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Statham J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
6.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Koepfer D.
7-667-5
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Kypson P.
6-46-3
Koepfer D.
Choinski J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-44-66-4
Koepfer D.
Neuchrist M.
4-66-16-4
Kypson P.
Atmane T.
6-26-756-2
Choinski J.
Tirante T.
6-46-4
R16
Neuchrist M.
Olivo R.[4]
6-44-1
Kypson P.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-3
Tirante T.
Comesana F.
6-26-3
Atmane T.
Galarneau A.
7-54-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Ejupovic E.
3-66-07-64
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Dellien Velasco M.
7-646-3
Choinski J.
Reis Da Silva J.
7-57-5
Koepfer D.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-2
R32
Yevseyev D.
Hardt N.[8]
7-57-61
Ejupovic E.
Pouille L.
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Bellier A.[2]
6-26-4
Tirante T.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-644-66-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ficovich J.[7]
7-646-3
Kypson P.
Vallejo A.
6-16-3
Neuchrist M.
Jung J.
6-07-63
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Chappell N.
7-656-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Walton A.
6-13-66-4
Atmane T.
Lock B.
2-66-37-5
Comesana F.
Dougaz A.
6-26-2
Choinski J.
Mena F.[5]
4-67-56-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Mejia N.
6-47-65
Pacheco Mendez R.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-27-65
Koepfer D.
Burruchaga R.
6-16-3
Olivo R.[4]
Statham J.
7-56-3