Caty Mcnally vs Jule Niemeier — Charleston Round of 64

Charleston · WTA · Round of 64
Caty Mcnally
USA
Caty Mcnally
#57WTA
1817ELO
1746Clay ELO
$711kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
Jule Niemeier
GER
Jule Niemeier
#569WTA
1418ELO
1398Clay ELO
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Mcnally C.
6-4 6-1
Niemeier J.
Mcnally C.
662
Niemeier J.
410

Caty Mcnally defeated Jule Niemeier 6-4 6-1 in the Charleston round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Caty Mcnally came in ranked #57, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mcnally C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Niemeier J.

Niemeier J.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Mcnally C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Mcnally C.Niemeier J.
0
Serve
—
50
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mcnally C.Niemeier J.
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
42%
Service points won·Even
56%
54%
Return points won·Even
47%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
50%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
7.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mcnally C.Niemeier J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
12
Break points saved·Dominant
73
33
Break points won·Clear edge
99
82
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
78
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mcnally C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Niemeier J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.9+348 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Clay Elo 1398
9.5Overall Elo 1817
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1418
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.7
Country comfort
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mcnally C.Niemeier J.
Freshness·
96
—

Mcnally C.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 62%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[2]
Bencic B.[4]
7-666-4
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[2]
Kasatkina D.[3]
7-57-5
Bencic B.[4]
Pegula J.[1]
7-57-65
Quarter-finals
Jabeur O.[2]
Kalinskaya A.
6-04-1
Pegula J.[1]
Badosa P.[12]
6-37-66
Kasatkina D.[3]
Keys M.[9]
6-756-46-2
Bencic B.[4]
Alexandrova E.[7]
6-36-3
R16
Pegula J.[1]
Begu I.[15]
7-54-66-4
Kasatkina D.[3]
Pera B.
6-37-63
Keys M.[9]
Linette M.[8]
6-23-66-1
Alexandrova E.[7]
Grabher J.
6-46-2
Bencic B.[4]
Rogers S.
4-67-56-2
Badosa P.[12]
Shnaider D.
6-16-3
Kalinskaya A.
Azarenka V.[6]
6-47-65
Jabeur O.[2]
Dolehide C.
6-37-5
R32
Pegula J.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-26-0
Grabher J.
Vickery S.
6-16-2
Keys M.[9]
Baptiste H.
6-16-2
Azarenka V.[6]
Stephens S.
3-66-36-2
Kalinskaya A.
Cornet A.
7-644-66-2
Kasatkina D.[3]
Brengle M.
6-26-1
Badosa P.[12]
Fernandez L.
7-57-66
Bencic B.[4]
Sebov K.
6-06-3
Dolehide C.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-25-76-3
Shnaider D.
Kudermetova V.[5]
6-46-3
Rogers S.
Mcnally C.
6-747-56-1
Jabeur O.[2]
Tsurenko L.
6-36-3
Begu I.[15]
Kenin S.
6-16-4
Alexandrova E.[7]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-3
Linette M.[8]
Gracheva V.
6-737-56-4
Pera B.
Bucsa C.
6-36-4
R64
Sebov K.
Davis L.
4-66-16-2
Rogers S.
Collins D.[13]
6-726-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Svitolina E.
6-736-26-4
Keys M.[9]
Navarro E.
6-46-3
Brengle M.
Kanepi K.
6-36-4
Fruhvirtova L.
Teichmann J.[14]
6-23-66-2
Blinkova A.
Bondar A.
7-676-2
Fernandez L.
Rodina E.
6-36-2
Vickery S.
Day K.
6-46-2
Pera B.
Liu C.
6-46-716-3
Cornet A.
Crawley F.
6-06-2
Gracheva V.
Friedsam A.
7-636-2
Tsurenko L.
Ormaechea P.
6-16-1
Mcnally C.
Niemeier J.
6-46-1
Kalinskaya A.
Kalinina A.[11]
7-666-4
Kenin S.
Sasnovich A.
6-16-756-1
Begu I.[15]
Galfi D.
6-17-5
Badosa P.[12]
Sherif M.
6-36-1
Stephens S.
Chirico L.
3-66-16-2
Dolehide C.
Lisicki S.
6-46-4
Baptiste H.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Grabher J.
Zhang S.[10]
6-41-66-3
Shnaider D.
Parks A.
6-46-3
Bucsa C.
Bouzkova M.[16]
7-56-736-1