Zsombor Piros vs Zdenek Kolar — Barletta CH Round of 16

Barletta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
Zdenek Kolar
CZE7
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Piros Z.
3-6 6-3 6-2
Kolar Z.
Piros Z.
3662
Kolar Z.
6321

Zsombor Piros defeated Zdenek Kolar 3-6 6-3 6-2 in the Barletta CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
26
Break points saved·Dominant
84
53
Break points won·Even
32
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Kolar Z.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+136 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Clay Elo 1485
7.5Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1506
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Kolar Z.
Freshness·Dominant
54
90

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mochizuki S.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Agamenone F.[3]
6-45-76-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Ionel N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Diez S.
6-16-2
Mochizuki S.
Piros Z.
6-46-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Pellegrino A.
6-37-5
Agamenone F.[3]
Lokoli L.[6]
7-56-2
R16
Agamenone F.[3]
Gigante M.
3-2
Pellegrino A.
Travaglia S.
6-26-2
Ionel N.
Navone M.
6-16-4
Diez S.
Caruso S.
6-26-4
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.[7]
3-66-36-2
Mochizuki S.
Torres J.
6-27-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Berrettini J.
6-26-2
Lokoli L.[6]
Droguet T.
4-67-56-4
R32
Droguet T.
Napolitano S.
7-647-62
Torres J.
Shevchenko A.[1]
6-35-76-4
Caruso S.
Cobolli F.[8]
6-47-61
Mochizuki S.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-3
Ionel N.
Piraino G.
6-44-66-3
Travaglia S.
Serdarusic N.
7-6106-3
Diez S.
Jianu F.
7-656-1
Navone M.
Misolic F.[2]
7-57-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Paire B.[4]
6-24-66-4
Berrettini J.
Sweeny D.
6-17-64
Lokoli L.[6]
Mager G.
7-646-3
Kolar Z.[7]
Ocleppo J.
7-632-66-2
Piros Z.
Lavagno E.
3-66-16-3
Pellegrino A.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-0
Agamenone F.[3]
Mccabe J.
6-06-1
Gigante M.
Zekic M.
3-66-17-67