Matteo Gigante vs Miljan Zekic — Barletta CH Round of 32

Barletta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
SRB
Miljan Zekic
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Gigante M.
3-6 6-1 7-6
Zekic M.
Gigante M.
36792
Zekic M.
61671

Matteo Gigante defeated Miljan Zekic 3-6 6-1 7-6 in the Barletta CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Miljan Zekic came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zekic M.

Zekic M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Serve advantage — Gigante M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Zekic M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Zekic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
22
Break points saved·Dominant
78
36
Break points won·Dominant
35
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
68
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zekic M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.4
Surface form
2.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mochizuki S.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Agamenone F.[3]
6-45-76-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Ionel N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Diez S.
6-16-2
Mochizuki S.
Piros Z.
6-46-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Pellegrino A.
6-37-5
Agamenone F.[3]
Lokoli L.[6]
7-56-2
R16
Agamenone F.[3]
Gigante M.
3-2
Pellegrino A.
Travaglia S.
6-26-2
Ionel N.
Navone M.
6-16-4
Diez S.
Caruso S.
6-26-4
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.[7]
3-66-36-2
Mochizuki S.
Torres J.
6-27-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Berrettini J.
6-26-2
Lokoli L.[6]
Droguet T.
4-67-56-4
R32
Droguet T.
Napolitano S.
7-647-62
Torres J.
Shevchenko A.[1]
6-35-76-4
Caruso S.
Cobolli F.[8]
6-47-61
Mochizuki S.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-3
Ionel N.
Piraino G.
6-44-66-3
Travaglia S.
Serdarusic N.
7-6106-3
Diez S.
Jianu F.
7-656-1
Navone M.
Misolic F.[2]
7-57-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Paire B.[4]
6-24-66-4
Berrettini J.
Sweeny D.
6-17-64
Lokoli L.[6]
Mager G.
7-646-3
Kolar Z.[7]
Ocleppo J.
7-632-66-2
Piros Z.
Lavagno E.
3-66-16-3
Pellegrino A.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-0
Agamenone F.[3]
Mccabe J.
6-06-1
Gigante M.
Zekic M.
3-66-17-67