Ivan Gakhov vs Martin Landaluce — Murcia CH Round of 32

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
Martin Landaluce
ESP
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1654Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
Gakhov I.
7-6 6-4
Landaluce M.
Gakhov I.
7762
Landaluce M.
6440

Ivan Gakhov defeated Martin Landaluce 7-6 6-4 in the Murcia CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Landaluce M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Landaluce M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Landaluce M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 172). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Landaluce M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
92
Break points won·Slight edge
9
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Landaluce M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
7.3+270 Clay Elo edge
1.7Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
8.3Overall Elo 1727
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Landaluce M.
Freshness·
—
100

Landaluce M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Arnaldi M.[2]
Gojo B.[1]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Gojo B.[1]
Llamas Ruiz P.
7-646-736-4
Arnaldi M.[2]
Trungelliti M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Arnaldi M.[2]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-1
Llamas Ruiz P.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-36-1
Trungelliti M.
Durasovic V.
6-46-4
Gojo B.[1]
De Jong J.
6-12-66-3
R16
De Jong J.
Ritschard A.[5]
6-46-1
Kukushkin M.
Lopez San Martin A.
6-16-6
Llamas Ruiz P.
Shelbayh A.
7-647-65
Dutra Da Silva D.
Polmans M.
6-34-66-3
Gojo B.[1]
Gakhov I.
7-663-67-65
Arnaldi M.[2]
Coppejans K.
3-66-46-4
Durasovic V.
Moro Canas A.
7-676-4
Trungelliti M.
Collarini A.[6]
4-66-26-3
R32
Durasovic V.
Roca Batalla O.
7-623-1
Kukushkin M.
Debru G.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Collarini A.[6]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-26-2
Llamas Ruiz P.
Giustino L.[8]
6-26-2
Shelbayh A.
Domingues J.
7-636-4
De Jong J.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-3
Gojo B.[1]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-36-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Campana Lee G.
7-54-67-5
Gakhov I.
Landaluce M.
7-646-4
Lopez San Martin A.
Butvilas E.
6-26-726-2
Moro Canas A.
Brancaccio R.[3]
6-36-4
Trungelliti M.
Edmund K.
1-66-36-3
Polmans M.
Uchida K.[4]
6-47-67
Ritschard A.[5]
Geerts M.
4-66-46-3
Arnaldi M.[2]
Lopez F.
6-37-64