Hailey Baptiste vs Xiyu Wang — Charleston Round of 64

Charleston · WTA · Round of 64
Hailey Baptiste
USA
Hailey Baptiste
#30WTA
1844ELO
1771Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$3.6MCAREER
24 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
Xiyu Wang
CHN
Xiyu Wang
#86WTA
1772ELO
1730Clay ELO
25 yrs · 182 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
Baptiste H.
6-3 6-3
Wang X.
Baptiste H.
662
Wang X.
330

Hailey Baptiste defeated Xiyu Wang 6-3 6-3 in the Charleston round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Hailey Baptiste came in ranked #30, defending last year's round of 32. Hailey Baptiste claimed a first win over Xiyu Wang in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-27Roland GarrosR64clayXiyu Wang4-5

Serve vs return

This season
Baptiste H.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Wang X.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Baptiste H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baptiste H.Wang X.
82
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baptiste H.Wang X.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 161). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baptiste H.Wang X.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
83
63
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
87
Break points won·Clear edge
79
91
Deciding sets·Clear edge
88
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baptiste H.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Wang X.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+40 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1730
6.4Overall Elo 1844
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1772
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
3.4
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.1
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.3
Country comfort
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baptiste H.Wang X.
Freshness·
—
95

Wang X.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 62%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[2]
Bencic B.[4]
7-666-4
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[2]
Kasatkina D.[3]
7-57-5
Bencic B.[4]
Pegula J.[1]
7-57-65
Quarter-finals
Jabeur O.[2]
Kalinskaya A.
6-04-1
Pegula J.[1]
Badosa P.[12]
6-37-66
Kasatkina D.[3]
Keys M.[9]
6-756-46-2
Bencic B.[4]
Alexandrova E.[7]
6-36-3
R16
Pegula J.[1]
Begu I.[15]
7-54-66-4
Kasatkina D.[3]
Pera B.
6-37-63
Keys M.[9]
Linette M.[8]
6-23-66-1
Alexandrova E.[7]
Grabher J.
6-46-2
Bencic B.[4]
Rogers S.
4-67-56-2
Badosa P.[12]
Shnaider D.
6-16-3
Kalinskaya A.
Azarenka V.[6]
6-47-65
Jabeur O.[2]
Dolehide C.
6-37-5
R32
Pegula J.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-26-0
Grabher J.
Vickery S.
6-16-2
Keys M.[9]
Baptiste H.
6-16-2
Azarenka V.[6]
Stephens S.
3-66-36-2
Kalinskaya A.
Cornet A.
7-644-66-2
Kasatkina D.[3]
Brengle M.
6-26-1
Badosa P.[12]
Fernandez L.
7-57-66
Bencic B.[4]
Sebov K.
6-06-3
Dolehide C.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-25-76-3
Shnaider D.
Kudermetova V.[5]
6-46-3
Rogers S.
Mcnally C.
6-747-56-1
Jabeur O.[2]
Tsurenko L.
6-36-3
Begu I.[15]
Kenin S.
6-16-4
Alexandrova E.[7]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-3
Linette M.[8]
Gracheva V.
6-737-56-4
Pera B.
Bucsa C.
6-36-4
R64
Sebov K.
Davis L.
4-66-16-2
Rogers S.
Collins D.[13]
6-726-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Svitolina E.
6-736-26-4
Keys M.[9]
Navarro E.
6-46-3
Brengle M.
Kanepi K.
6-36-4
Fruhvirtova L.
Teichmann J.[14]
6-23-66-2
Blinkova A.
Bondar A.
7-676-2
Fernandez L.
Rodina E.
6-36-2
Vickery S.
Day K.
6-46-2
Pera B.
Liu C.
6-46-716-3
Cornet A.
Crawley F.
6-06-2
Gracheva V.
Friedsam A.
7-636-2
Tsurenko L.
Ormaechea P.
6-16-1
Mcnally C.
Niemeier J.
6-46-1
Kalinskaya A.
Kalinina A.[11]
7-666-4
Kenin S.
Sasnovich A.
6-16-756-1
Begu I.[15]
Galfi D.
6-17-5
Badosa P.[12]
Sherif M.
6-36-1
Stephens S.
Chirico L.
3-66-16-2
Dolehide C.
Lisicki S.
6-46-4
Baptiste H.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Grabher J.
Zhang S.[10]
6-41-66-3
Shnaider D.
Parks A.
6-46-3
Bucsa C.
Bouzkova M.[16]
7-56-736-1