Matteo Arnaldi vs Borna Gojo — Murcia CH Final

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Matteo Arnaldi
ITA2
Matteo Arnaldi
#34ATP
1830ELO
1830Clay ELO
$1.2MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
Borna Gojo
CRO1
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1642Clay ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Arnaldi M.
6-4 7-6
Gojo B.
Arnaldi M.
6772
Gojo B.
4640

Matteo Arnaldi defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 7-6 in the Murcia CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Matteo Arnaldi came in ranked #34.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Arnaldi M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Arnaldi M.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Arnaldi M.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
10.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Arnaldi M.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
53
Break points saved·Even
97
95
Break points won·Dominant
51
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Arnaldi M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gojo B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+189 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Clay Elo 1642
5.6Overall Elo 1830
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1683
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Arnaldi M.Gojo B.
Freshness·Even
97
100

Arnaldi M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Arnaldi M.[2]
Gojo B.[1]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Gojo B.[1]
Llamas Ruiz P.
7-646-736-4
Arnaldi M.[2]
Trungelliti M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Arnaldi M.[2]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-1
Llamas Ruiz P.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-36-1
Trungelliti M.
Durasovic V.
6-46-4
Gojo B.[1]
De Jong J.
6-12-66-3
R16
De Jong J.
Ritschard A.[5]
6-46-1
Kukushkin M.
Lopez San Martin A.
6-16-6
Llamas Ruiz P.
Shelbayh A.
7-647-65
Dutra Da Silva D.
Polmans M.
6-34-66-3
Gojo B.[1]
Gakhov I.
7-663-67-65
Arnaldi M.[2]
Coppejans K.
3-66-46-4
Durasovic V.
Moro Canas A.
7-676-4
Trungelliti M.
Collarini A.[6]
4-66-26-3
R32
Durasovic V.
Roca Batalla O.
7-623-1
Kukushkin M.
Debru G.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Collarini A.[6]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-26-2
Llamas Ruiz P.
Giustino L.[8]
6-26-2
Shelbayh A.
Domingues J.
7-636-4
De Jong J.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-3
Gojo B.[1]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-36-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Campana Lee G.
7-54-67-5
Gakhov I.
Landaluce M.
7-646-4
Lopez San Martin A.
Butvilas E.
6-26-726-2
Moro Canas A.
Brancaccio R.[3]
6-36-4
Trungelliti M.
Edmund K.
1-66-36-3
Polmans M.
Uchida K.[4]
6-47-67
Ritschard A.[5]
Geerts M.
4-66-46-3
Arnaldi M.[2]
Lopez F.
6-37-64