Eugenie Bouchard vs Ylena In Albon — Bogota Round of 32

Bogota · WTA · Round of 32
CAN
Eugenie Bouchard
#834WTA
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2023
clay
SUI
Ylena In Albon
#511WTA
1389ELO
1371Clay ELO
27 yrs · 160 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Bouchard E.
6-3 6-2
In Albon Y.
Bouchard E.
662
In Albon Y.
320

Eugenie Bouchard defeated Ylena In Albon 6-3 6-2 in the Bogota round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ylena In Albon came in ranked #511, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bouchard E.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs In Albon Y.

In Albon Y.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bouchard E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bouchard E.In Albon Y.
1st serve in·Even
66%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
56%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
53%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Even
53%
50%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bouchard E.In Albon Y.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
20
10
Break points saved·Dominant
47
7
Break points won·Clear edge
65
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
7
29
Tiebreaks·
83
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bouchard E.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 168 days (−1.5)
In Albon Y.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 252 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
0.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Maria T.[2]
Stearns P.
6-32-66-4
Semi-finals
Stearns P.
Rakhimova K.[4]
3-66-26-2
Maria T.[2]
Jones F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Stearns P.
Zidansek T.
6-32-66-2
Rakhimova K.[4]
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-47-5
Maria T.[2]
Brancaccio N.
6-36-2
Jones F.
Pigossi L.[6]
6-46-2
R16
Zidansek T.
Bjorklund M.
7-637-63
Stearns P.
Avanesyan E.
6-46-1
Maria T.[2]
Alves C.
6-26-4
Pigossi L.[6]
Stevanovic N.
7-55-76-4
Rakhimova K.[4]
Bouchard E.
6-06-776-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Arango E.
6-46-3
Brancaccio N.
Kraus S.
6-26-2
Jones F.
Zhao C.
6-26-1
R32
Kraus S.
Podoroska N.[8]
6-47-64
Avanesyan E.
Errani S.[5]
6-16-0
Bjorklund M.
Mertens E.[1]
6-14-67-63
Rakhimova K.[4]
Serban R.
7-636-3
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Bolsova A.
6-06-4
Arango E.
Tan H.
7-53-1
Alves C.
Yastremska D.
4-67-656-2
Zhao C.
Carle M.
4-67-57-66
Brancaccio N.
Papamichail D.
6-26-2
Maria T.[2]
Scott K.
6-16-4
Pigossi L.[6]
Samudio A.
6-16-0
Bouchard E.
In Albon Y.
6-36-2
Zidansek T.
Jani R.
6-06-1
Jones F.
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
7-636-1
Stearns P.
Vicens Mas R.
6-36-1
Stevanovic N.
Bassols Ribera M.
7-617-5