Max Purcell vs Beibit Zhukayev — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS1
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 March 2023
hard
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Purcell M.
7-6 2-6 7-6
Zhukayev B.
Purcell M.
772772
Zhukayev B.
616651

Max Purcell defeated Beibit Zhukayev 7-6 2-6 7-6 in the Lille CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
33%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
10.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Zhukayev B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
31
Break points saved·Even
92
94
Break points won·Slight edge
10
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
25
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zhukayev B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.8
Surface form
2.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.[4]
Purcell M.[1]
6-736-46-2
Semi-finals
Virtanen O.[4]
Rodionov J.[2]
6-36-1
Purcell M.[1]
Geerts M.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Janvier M.
6-6
Virtanen O.[4]
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Celikbilek A.
6-766-46-2
Rodionov J.[2]
Diallo G.
2-67-56-1
R16
Diallo G.
Berankis R.
6-37-5
Sachko V.
Zuk K.
6-44-67-5
Celikbilek A.
Ilkel C.
7-636-4
Purcell M.[1]
Mayot H.
7-657-5
Rodionov J.[2]
De Schepper K.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.[4]
Hoang A.
7-646-3
Geerts M.
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Janvier M.
Collignon R.
3-66-36-2
R32
Zuk K.
Furness E.
6-44-0
Berankis R.
Dougaz A.
6-17-5
Janvier M.
Jasika O.
7-50-66-2
Diallo G.
Grenier H.[5]
4-66-46-2
Collignon R.
Paire B.[6]
6-23-66-4
Jacquet K.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
5-77-616-4
Ilkel C.
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Rodionov J.[2]
Tu L.
5-76-26-2
Virtanen O.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
6-34-66-2
Hoang A.
Added D.
6-26-3
Sachko V.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-16-0
Celikbilek A.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-46-2
Geerts M.
Gombos N.[3]
6-46-3
Mayot H.
Leshem E.
6-36-3
Purcell M.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-612-67-65
De Schepper K.
Kukushkin M.
6-26-3