Beibit Zhukayev vs Ji Sung Nam — Lille CH Qualifying Round 1

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
KAZ7
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 March 2023
hard
KOR
Ji Sung Nam
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Zhukayev B.
6-1 6-7 6-3
Nam J.
Zhukayev B.
661162
Nam J.
171331

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Ji Sung Nam 6-1 6-7 6-3 in the Lille CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Beibit Zhukayev came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nam J.

Nam J.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Nam J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Nam J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
31
0
Break points saved·Dominant
94
26
Break points won·Clear edge
1
21
Deciding sets·Slight edge
25
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nam J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
De Schepper K.[9]
Ilkel C.[1]
6-46-1
Hoang A.[10]
Lajal M.
6-36-1
Leshem E.[6]
Kachmazov A.[11]
1-67-656-4
Sachko V.[4]
Cukierman D.[12]
6-16-2
Zhukayev B.[7]
Forejtek J.[3]
6-46-4
Janvier M.[8]
Mccabe J.[2]
6-47-5
Q1
Janvier M.[8]
Paul J.
7-57-68
Kachmazov A.[11]
Olivetti A.
6-46-2
Leshem E.[6]
Bertrand R.
6-37-5
Hoang A.[10]
Hemery C.
4-66-44-3
Lajal M.
Blanch U.[5]
6-16-4
Cukierman D.[12]
Kadhe A.
7-56-2
Sachko V.[4]
Bourgue M.
6-36-1
Zhukayev B.[7]
Nam J.
6-16-7116-3
Forejtek J.[3]
Schell N.
6-37-63
Mccabe J.[2]
Mertens Y.
6-26-3
De Schepper K.[9]
Briand J.
1-66-36-2
Ilkel C.[1]
Marie J.
6-16-1