Gianluca Mager vs Giulio Zeppieri — Sanremo CH Round of 16

Sanremo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 March 2023
clay
Giulio Zeppieri
ITA8
Giulio Zeppieri
#218ATP
1622ELO
1566Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
Mager G.
7-6 6-3
Zeppieri G.
Mager G.
7762
Zeppieri G.
6430

Gianluca Mager defeated Giulio Zeppieri 7-6 6-3 in the Sanremo CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Giulio Zeppieri came in ranked #218, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mager G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Zeppieri G.

Zeppieri G.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Serve advantage — Zeppieri G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mager G.Zeppieri G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
7.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 178). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mager G.Zeppieri G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
55
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
95
Break points won·Dominant
4
39
Deciding sets·Even
66
68
Tiebreaks·Even
40
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mager G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zeppieri G.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.3
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
5.2
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.[5]
Varillas J.[1]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-36-4
Van Assche L.[5]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.
Mager G.
6-46-3
Van Assche L.[5]
Muller A.
6-26-1
Coppejans K.
Piros Z.
6-16-727-64
Varillas J.[1]
Vavassori A.
3-66-36-4
R16
Muller A.
Shevchenko A.[3]
7-56-2
Coppejans K.
Ofner S.
6-47-5
Varillas J.[1]
Pellegrino A.
6-41-66-1
Van Assche L.[5]
Fonio G.
6-36-3
Kopriva V.
Cobolli F.
6-36-1
Mager G.
Zeppieri G.[8]
7-646-3
Piros Z.
Kovalik J.
6-37-66
Vavassori A.
Lavagno E.
7-57-65
R32
Vavassori A.
Kotov P.[7]
4-67-54-0
Piros Z.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-37-63
Fonio G.
Ferrari G.
6-17-62
Shevchenko A.[3]
Tseng C.
6-36-3
Varillas J.[1]
Arnaboldi F.
6-47-61
Ofner S.
Guinard M.
6-26-3
Kopriva V.
Cecchinato M.[2]
6-46-4
Cobolli F.
Maestrelli F.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Nardi L.
6-46-4
Zeppieri G.[8]
Giannessi A.
6-16-1
Muller A.
Uchida K.
1-66-36-3
Van Assche L.[5]
Peniston R.
2-66-36-2
Kovalik J.
Harris B.
6-26-1
Coppejans K.
Karatsev A.[4]
5-76-26-3
Lavagno E.
Vacherot V.
6-36-3
Pellegrino A.
Gigante M.
7-676-4