Dominik Koepfer vs Federico Gaio — Mexico City CH Quarter-final

Mexico City CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 March 2023
clay
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Koepfer D.
6-4 4-6 7-6
Gaio F.
Koepfer D.
64772
Gaio F.
46651

Dominik Koepfer defeated Federico Gaio 6-4 4-6 7-6 in the Mexico City CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Federico Gaio came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Koepfer D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Serve advantage — Koepfer D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Koepfer D.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Koepfer D.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
76
Break points won·Dominant
28
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Koepfer D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gaio F.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
7.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.
Tirante T.
2-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Koepfer D.
Neuchrist M.
6-26-4
Tirante T.
Choinski J.
7-654-66-4
Quarter-finals
Neuchrist M.
Bellier A.
7-647-65
Tirante T.
Mejia N.
6-13-67-64
Choinski J.
Couacaud E.
6-16-2
Koepfer D.
Gaio F.
6-44-67-65
R16
Tirante T.
Olivo R.
6-796-46-3
Neuchrist M.
Meligeni Alves F.[7]
7-627-65
Gaio F.
Huesler M.[1]
3-66-06-3
Couacaud E.
Tabilo A.[6]
7-53-66-4
Mejia N.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-25-77-65
Choinski J.
Galan D.[2]
4-66-36-2
Bellier A.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-45-76-4
Koepfer D.
Barrios Vera T.
4-66-47-5
R32
Meligeni Alves F.[7]
Ficovich J.
6-36-3
Barrios Vera T.
Hanfmann Y.[5]
6-37-5
Galan D.[2]
Atmane T.
6-36-4
Choinski J.
Galarneau A.
6-26-2
Couacaud E.
Hardt N.
6-747-56-3
Tabilo A.[6]
Hong S.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-27-5
Olivo R.
Darderi L.[8]
6-46-4
Neuchrist M.
Krueger M.
6-41-66-1
Bellier A.
Ejupovic E.
6-787-656-2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Bagnis F.[3]
6-36-4
Koepfer D.
Noguchi R.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Londero J.
7-653-67-65
Huesler M.[1]
Mena F.
6-47-5
Mejia N.
Olivieri G.
6-26-0
Tirante T.
Tomic B.
6-26-2