Kimmer Coppejans vs Zsombor Piros — Sanremo CH Quarter-final

Sanremo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 March 2023
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Coppejans K.
6-1 6-7 7-6
Piros Z.
Coppejans K.
662772
Piros Z.
177641

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Zsombor Piros 6-1 6-7 7-6 in the Sanremo CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Kimmer Coppejans came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
84
Break points won·Even
29
32
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Piros Z.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1513
Surface ELO
6.9+107 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1661
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.9
Surface form
7.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
4.4
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Piros Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
54

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.[5]
Varillas J.[1]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-36-4
Van Assche L.[5]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.
Mager G.
6-46-3
Van Assche L.[5]
Muller A.
6-26-1
Coppejans K.
Piros Z.
6-16-727-64
Varillas J.[1]
Vavassori A.
3-66-36-4
R16
Muller A.
Shevchenko A.[3]
7-56-2
Coppejans K.
Ofner S.
6-47-5
Varillas J.[1]
Pellegrino A.
6-41-66-1
Van Assche L.[5]
Fonio G.
6-36-3
Kopriva V.
Cobolli F.
6-36-1
Mager G.
Zeppieri G.[8]
7-646-3
Piros Z.
Kovalik J.
6-37-66
Vavassori A.
Lavagno E.
7-57-65
R32
Vavassori A.
Kotov P.[7]
4-67-54-0
Piros Z.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-37-63
Fonio G.
Ferrari G.
6-17-62
Shevchenko A.[3]
Tseng C.
6-36-3
Varillas J.[1]
Arnaboldi F.
6-47-61
Ofner S.
Guinard M.
6-26-3
Kopriva V.
Cecchinato M.[2]
6-46-4
Cobolli F.
Maestrelli F.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Nardi L.
6-46-4
Zeppieri G.[8]
Giannessi A.
6-16-1
Muller A.
Uchida K.
1-66-36-3
Van Assche L.[5]
Peniston R.
2-66-36-2
Kovalik J.
Harris B.
6-26-1
Coppejans K.
Karatsev A.[4]
5-76-26-3
Lavagno E.
Vacherot V.
6-36-3
Pellegrino A.
Gigante M.
7-676-4