Altug Celikbilek vs Cem Ilkel — Lille CH Round of 16

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 March 2023
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Celikbilek A.
7-6 6-4
Ilkel C.
Celikbilek A.
7762
Ilkel C.
6340

Altug Celikbilek defeated Cem Ilkel 7-6 6-4 in the Lille CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
49
Break points won·Dominant
38
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ilkel C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.6
Surface form
7.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.[4]
Purcell M.[1]
6-736-46-2
Semi-finals
Virtanen O.[4]
Rodionov J.[2]
6-36-1
Purcell M.[1]
Geerts M.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Janvier M.
6-6
Virtanen O.[4]
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Celikbilek A.
6-766-46-2
Rodionov J.[2]
Diallo G.
2-67-56-1
R16
Diallo G.
Berankis R.
6-37-5
Sachko V.
Zuk K.
6-44-67-5
Celikbilek A.
Ilkel C.
7-636-4
Purcell M.[1]
Mayot H.
7-657-5
Rodionov J.[2]
De Schepper K.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.[4]
Hoang A.
7-646-3
Geerts M.
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Janvier M.
Collignon R.
3-66-36-2
R32
Zuk K.
Furness E.
6-44-0
Berankis R.
Dougaz A.
6-17-5
Janvier M.
Jasika O.
7-50-66-2
Diallo G.
Grenier H.[5]
4-66-46-2
Collignon R.
Paire B.[6]
6-23-66-4
Jacquet K.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
5-77-616-4
Ilkel C.
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Rodionov J.[2]
Tu L.
5-76-26-2
Virtanen O.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
6-34-66-2
Hoang A.
Added D.
6-26-3
Sachko V.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-16-0
Celikbilek A.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-46-2
Geerts M.
Gombos N.[3]
6-46-3
Mayot H.
Leshem E.
6-36-3
Purcell M.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-612-67-65
De Schepper K.
Kukushkin M.
6-26-3