Jan Lennard Struff vs Zhizhen Zhang — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 2

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Jan Lennard Struff
GER24
Jan Lennard Struff
#41ATP
1694ELO
1634Hard ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2023
hard
Zhizhen Zhang
CHN5
Zhizhen Zhang
#156ATP
1682ELO
1642Hard ELO
$546kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWLW
Struff J.
6-4 6-2
Zhang Z.
Struff J.
662
Zhang Z.
420

Jan Lennard Struff defeated Zhizhen Zhang 6-4 6-2 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jan Lennard Struff came in ranked #41, leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 128. Jan Lennard Struff extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-01WimbledonR64grassJan Lennard Struff5-7 6-3 7-6(1) 7-6(8)
2023-06-12StuttgartR32grassJan Lennard Struff6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Struff J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Zhang Z.

Zhang Z.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Struff J.Zhang Z.
36
Serve
24
40
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Struff J.Zhang Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.8
7.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Struff J.Zhang Z.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
61
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
94
Break points won·Slight edge
21
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
68
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Struff J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Zhang Z.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1634
Surface ELO
5.2+8 Hard Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1694
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1682
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.6
Minutes 14d
3.5
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
4.9
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Struff J.Zhang Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
71
86

Struff J.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d) · Zhang Z.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
19°COvercast
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 73%
Q2
Vukic A.
Kovacevic A.[9]
6-37-64
Altmaier D.[8]
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Borges N.[1]
Gojo B.[18]
6-46-767-66
Paire B.
Kokkinakis T.[6]
6-44-67-5
Kotov P.[15]
Albot R.[11]
6-26-3
Watanuki Y.[19]
Oconnell C.[2]
6-46-4
Struff J.[24]
Zhang Z.[5]
6-46-2
Safiullin R.[12]
Misolic F.
6-36-3
Garin C.[7]
Tabilo A.
7-656-1
Thompson J.[3]
Machac T.[21]
6-43-66-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Skatov T.
6-47-65
Eubanks C.[10]
Klein L.
6-726-37-64
Q1
Paire B.
Brouwer G.[17]
6-26-4
Blancaneaux G.
Hijikata R.[22]
3-66-36-4
Skatov T.
Gomez E.[4]
6-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Misolic F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[20]
6-35-3
Kotov P.[15]
Wu T.
6-27-65
Klein L.
Arnaldi M.[14]
6-44-66-4
Zhang Z.[5]
Bellucci M.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.[9]
Marterer M.
6-717-647-60
Vukic A.
Duckworth J.[13]
6-17-5
Albot R.[11]
Ymer E.
6-756-47-64
Thompson J.[3]
Olivo R.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[2]
Hanfmann Y.
7-626-4
Garin C.[7]
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Gojo B.[18]
Holt B.
6-747-657-63
Eubanks C.[10]
Shelbayh A.
6-36-3
Struff J.[24]
Tien L.
3-66-36-4
Borges N.[1]
Johnson S.
6-46-4
Machac T.[21]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Basilashvili N.[16]
6-41-66-1
Tabilo A.
Shevchenko A.[23]
4-66-16-4
Safiullin R.[12]
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-66-36-2
Watanuki Y.[19]
Blockx A.
3-66-36-0
Altmaier D.[8]
Damm M.
7-57-63