Tomas Machac vs Bradley Klahn — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Tomas Machac
CZE21
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2023
hard
USA
Bradley Klahn
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLL
Machac T.
6-4 6-4
Klahn B.
Machac T.
662
Klahn B.
440

Tomas Machac defeated Bradley Klahn 6-4 6-4 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Klahn B.

Klahn B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Klahn B.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Klahn B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
29%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Klahn B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
35
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
88
Break points won·Dominant
80
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Klahn B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
5.6
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
19°COvercast
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 73%
Q2
Vukic A.
Kovacevic A.[9]
6-37-64
Altmaier D.[8]
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Borges N.[1]
Gojo B.[18]
6-46-767-66
Paire B.
Kokkinakis T.[6]
6-44-67-5
Kotov P.[15]
Albot R.[11]
6-26-3
Watanuki Y.[19]
Oconnell C.[2]
6-46-4
Struff J.[24]
Zhang Z.[5]
6-46-2
Safiullin R.[12]
Misolic F.
6-36-3
Garin C.[7]
Tabilo A.
7-656-1
Thompson J.[3]
Machac T.[21]
6-43-66-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Skatov T.
6-47-65
Eubanks C.[10]
Klein L.
6-726-37-64
Q1
Paire B.
Brouwer G.[17]
6-26-4
Blancaneaux G.
Hijikata R.[22]
3-66-36-4
Skatov T.
Gomez E.[4]
6-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Misolic F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[20]
6-35-3
Kotov P.[15]
Wu T.
6-27-65
Klein L.
Arnaldi M.[14]
6-44-66-4
Zhang Z.[5]
Bellucci M.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.[9]
Marterer M.
6-717-647-60
Vukic A.
Duckworth J.[13]
6-17-5
Albot R.[11]
Ymer E.
6-756-47-64
Thompson J.[3]
Olivo R.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[2]
Hanfmann Y.
7-626-4
Garin C.[7]
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Gojo B.[18]
Holt B.
6-747-657-63
Eubanks C.[10]
Shelbayh A.
6-36-3
Struff J.[24]
Tien L.
3-66-36-4
Borges N.[1]
Johnson S.
6-46-4
Machac T.[21]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Basilashvili N.[16]
6-41-66-1
Tabilo A.
Shevchenko A.[23]
4-66-16-4
Safiullin R.[12]
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-66-36-2
Watanuki Y.[19]
Blockx A.
3-66-36-0
Altmaier D.[8]
Damm M.
7-57-63