Matteo Gigante vs Hamad Medjedovic — Zadar CH Round of 16

Zadar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2023
clay
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB
Hamad Medjedovic
#69ATP
1841ELO
1816Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
Gigante M.
6-1 6-2
Medjedovic H.
Gigante M.
662
Medjedovic H.
120

Matteo Gigante defeated Hamad Medjedovic 6-1 6-2 in the Zadar CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Hamad Medjedovic came in ranked #69, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Medjedovic H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Medjedovic H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
8.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Medjedovic H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
74
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
97
Break points won·Even
35
39
Deciding sets·Even
89
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Medjedovic H.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.5Clay Elo 1598
Surface ELO
7.5+218 Clay Elo edge
2.1Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
7.9Overall Elo 1841
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
4.0
7.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gigante M.Medjedovic H.
Freshness·
—
100

Medjedovic H.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Giannessi A.
Ofner S.[4]
6-45-77-66
Semi-finals
Giannessi A.
Cazaux A.
6-36-4
Ofner S.[4]
Cobolli F.[5]
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Giannessi A.
Piros Z.
7-666-2
Cazaux A.
Prizmic D.
6-16-1
Ofner S.[4]
Gigante M.
6-46-1
Cobolli F.[5]
Zeppieri G.
3-66-26-1
R16
Piros Z.
Caruso S.
6-26-3
Gigante M.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-2
Ofner S.[4]
Madaras D.
1-67-636-4
Prizmic D.
Kovalik J.[2]
6-36-4
Cazaux A.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Giannessi A.
Serdarusic N.
7-646-3
Cobolli F.[5]
Dzumhur D.
3-66-27-5
Zeppieri G.
Tseng C.[1]
4-66-16-4
R32
Serdarusic N.
Mager G.
6-46-2
Piros Z.
Peniston R.[3]
6-46-4
Caruso S.
Coppejans K.
3-67-646-1
Gigante M.
Ocleppo J.
6-32-66-4
Prizmic D.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Medjedovic H.
Kopriva V.[7]
6-46-2
Zeppieri G.
Pichler D.
6-16-4
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
4-66-46-2
Kovalik J.[2]
Jahn J.
5-76-36-2
Ajdukovic D.
Droguet T.
6-43-66-4
Giannessi A.
Guinard M.[8]
6-46-2
Madaras D.
Zekic M.
2-66-36-2
Ofner S.[4]
Fatic N.
7-612-66-2
Cobolli F.[5]
Poljicak M.
6-16-3
Dzumhur D.
Jianu F.
6-17-64
Tseng C.[1]
Milojevic N.
6-47-5