Mikhail Kukushkin vs Altug Celikbilek — Biel-Bienne CH Round of 32

Biel-Bienne CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2023
hard
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Kukushkin M.
6-2 6-0
Celikbilek A.
Kukushkin M.
662
Celikbilek A.
200

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-2 6-0 in the Biel-Bienne CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
46
40
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
73
Break points won·Even
41
38
Deciding sets·Clear edge
41
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.6
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.[2]
Broady L.[4]
6-30-0
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[2]
Hassan B.
6-37-5
Broady L.[4]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Broady L.[4]
Diallo G.
3-67-56-3
Hassan B.
Gombos N.[3]
7-626-2
Rodionov J.[2]
Virtanen O.[5]
7-645-76-3
Copil M.
Brunold M.
6-36-3
R16
Broady L.[4]
Neuchrist M.
6-47-5
Hassan B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-65
Copil M.
Stricker D.[1]
3-66-27-63
Diallo G.
Kivattsev K.
6-26-3
Rodionov J.[2]
Forti F.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.[5]
Cukierman D.
6-26-3
Gombos N.[3]
Kukushkin M.
7-624-66-2
Brunold M.
Rehberg M.
6-23-66-3
R32
Forti F.
Paul J.
7-656-4
Stricker D.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-627-65
Broady L.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-16-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Dougaz A.
6-33-67-68
Hassan B.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-634-67-66
Copil M.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[2]
Oberleitner N.
6-37-63
Kukushkin M.
Celikbilek A.
6-26-0
Cukierman D.
Vatutin A.
6-47-63
Brunold M.
Kolar Z.[6]
6-16-4
Rehberg M.
Masur D.
6-36-756-3
Neuchrist M.
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.[5]
Mccabe J.
6-46-4
Kivattsev K.
Lazarov A.
6-46-756-3
Gombos N.[3]
Dalla Valle E.
4-66-37-61
Diallo G.
Dietrich D.
4-66-16-4