Marius Copil vs Mika Brunold — Biel-Bienne CH Quarter-final

Biel-Bienne CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2023
hard
SUI
Mika Brunold
#414ATP
1466ELO
1443Hard ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Copil M.
6-3 6-3
Brunold M.
Copil M.
662
Brunold M.
330

Marius Copil defeated Mika Brunold 6-3 6-3 in the Biel-Bienne CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (65 vs 103). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
72
Break points won·Clear edge
3
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Brunold M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.[2]
Broady L.[4]
6-30-0
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[2]
Hassan B.
6-37-5
Broady L.[4]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Broady L.[4]
Diallo G.
3-67-56-3
Hassan B.
Gombos N.[3]
7-626-2
Rodionov J.[2]
Virtanen O.[5]
7-645-76-3
Copil M.
Brunold M.
6-36-3
R16
Broady L.[4]
Neuchrist M.
6-47-5
Hassan B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-65
Copil M.
Stricker D.[1]
3-66-27-63
Diallo G.
Kivattsev K.
6-26-3
Rodionov J.[2]
Forti F.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.[5]
Cukierman D.
6-26-3
Gombos N.[3]
Kukushkin M.
7-624-66-2
Brunold M.
Rehberg M.
6-23-66-3
R32
Forti F.
Paul J.
7-656-4
Stricker D.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-627-65
Broady L.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-16-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Dougaz A.
6-33-67-68
Hassan B.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-634-67-66
Copil M.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[2]
Oberleitner N.
6-37-63
Kukushkin M.
Celikbilek A.
6-26-0
Cukierman D.
Vatutin A.
6-47-63
Brunold M.
Kolar Z.[6]
6-16-4
Rehberg M.
Masur D.
6-36-756-3
Neuchrist M.
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.[5]
Mccabe J.
6-46-4
Kivattsev K.
Lazarov A.
6-46-756-3
Gombos N.[3]
Dalla Valle E.
4-66-37-61
Diallo G.
Dietrich D.
4-66-16-4