Emil Ruusuvuori vs Nuno Borges — Miami Masters Round of 128

Miami Masters · ATP · Round of 128
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2023
hard
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Ruusuvuori E.
6-1 6-4
Borges N.
Ruusuvuori E.
662
Borges N.
140

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Nuno Borges 6-1 6-4 in the Miami Masters round of 128 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nuno Borges came in ranked #52.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruusuvuori E.Borges N.
—
Serve
36
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
72
77
Break points saved·Even
97
98
Break points won·Slight edge
48
54
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruusuvuori E.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Borges N.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1577
Surface ELO
6.4+137 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1606
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1769
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
8.3
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
4.2
4.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.6
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Borges N.
Freshness·
—
93

Borges N.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
19°COvercast
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 73%
Final
Medvedev D.[4]
Sinner J.[10]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[10]
Alcaraz C.[1]
6-746-46-2
Medvedev D.[4]
Khachanov K.[14]
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Fritz T.[9]
6-46-2
Khachanov K.[14]
Cerundolo F.[25]
6-36-2
Sinner J.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-36-1
Medvedev D.[4]
Eubanks C.
6-37-5
R16
Alcaraz C.[1]
Paul T.[16]
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Mannarino A.
7-627-65
Fritz T.[9]
Rune H.[7]
6-36-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Van De Zandschulp B.[26]
4-66-47-5
Medvedev D.[4]
Halys Q.
6-46-2
Cerundolo F.[25]
Sonego L.
3-66-36-2
Khachanov K.[14]
Tsitsipas S.[2]
7-646-4
Sinner J.[10]
Rublev A.[6]
6-26-4
R32
Mannarino A.
Hurkacz H.[8]
7-657-60
Medvedev D.[4]
Molcan A.
W/O
Eubanks C.
Barrere G.
6-37-67
Cerundolo F.[25]
Auger Aliassime F.[5]
6-27-5
Sinner J.[10]
Dimitrov G.[21]
6-36-4
Halys Q.
Mcdonald M.
7-626-3
Sonego L.
Tiafoe F.[12]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Lajovic D.
6-07-65
Paul T.[16]
Davidovich Fokina A.[20]
6-37-5
Fritz T.[9]
Shapovalov D.[24]
6-46-4
Rune H.[7]
Schwartzman D.[31]
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Daniel T.
6-37-63
Rublev A.[6]
Kecmanovic M.[29]
6-16-2
Khachanov K.[14]
Lehecka J.
6-26-4
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Garin C.
6-34-66-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[26]
Ruud C.[3]
3-66-46-4
R64
Davidovich Fokina A.[20]
Nakashima B.
6-47-65
Paul T.[16]
Huesler M.
5-76-36-4
Fritz T.[9]
Nava E.
6-46-1
Rune H.[7]
Fucsovics M.
6-37-5
Ruud C.[3]
Ivashka I.
6-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[26]
Popyrin A.
4-67-646-2
Dimitrov G.[21]
Struff J.
4-67-656-4
Kecmanovic M.[29]
Humbert U.
6-46-757-63
Hurkacz H.[8]
Kokkinakis T.
6-7107-677-66
Mannarino A.
Shelton B.[32]
6-43-66-1
Eubanks C.
Coric B.[17]
3-66-46-2
Halys Q.
De Minaur A.[15]
6-757-637-68
Barrere G.
Norrie C.[11]
6-36-2
Mcdonald M.
Berrettini M.[19]
7-687-65
Medvedev D.[4]
Carballes Baena R.
6-16-2
Auger Aliassime F.[5]
Monteiro T.
7-657-68
Sonego L.
Evans D.[23]
4-66-36-2
Tiafoe F.[12]
Watanuki Y.
6-757-636-4
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Gasquet R.
W/O
Khachanov K.[14]
Etcheverry T.
6-13-66-3
Lehecka J.
Musetti L.[18]
6-46-4
Garin C.
Baez S.[27]
7-626-3
Rublev A.[6]
Wolf J.
7-636-4
Cerundolo F.[25]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Nishioka Y.[28]
7-651-66-2
Alcaraz C.[1]
Bagnis F.
6-06-2
Lajovic D.
Cressy M.[30]
6-47-62
Schwartzman D.[31]
Wu Y.
7-616-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Bautista Agut R.[22]
6-47-65
Daniel T.
Zverev A.[13]
6-06-4
Sinner J.[10]
Djere L.
6-46-2
Shapovalov D.[24]
Pella G.
6-33-66-3
R128
Bagnis F.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-31-66-4
Pella G.
Varillas J.
1-66-36-2
Popyrin A.
Ymer M.
7-654-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Borges N.
6-16-4
Djere L.
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Wolf J.
Bublik A.
7-56-3
Kokkinakis T.
Bergs Z.
4-66-37-67
Mannarino A.
Shang J.
1-66-46-2
Halys Q.
Martinez P.
6-27-64
Mcdonald M.
Galan D.
6-46-2
Molcan A.
Thompson J.
6-24-66-3
Sonego L.
Thiem D.
7-676-2
Watanuki Y.
Paire B.
6-47-5
Etcheverry T.
Kotov P.
6-26-2
Daniel T.
Rinderknech A.
4-1
Humbert U.
Monfils G.
3-3
Carballes Baena R.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-03-0
Nakashima B.
Otte O.
7-636-3
Kovacevic A.
Munar J.
7-642-66-1
Struff J.
Fognini F.
6-45-76-4
Eubanks C.
Kudla D.
7-626-2
Nava E.
Isner J.
7-657-64
Lajovic D.
Murray A.
6-47-5
Huesler M.
Ramos A.
6-747-626-3
Wu Y.
Edmund K.
7-57-5
Ivashka I.
Altmaier D.
6-26-1
Barrere G.
Safiullin R.
6-43-66-3
Monteiro T.
Kubler J.
6-47-66
Lehecka J.
Coria F.
6-36-4
Garin C.
Giron M.
6-42-66-4
Gasquet R.
Oconnell C.
6-43-66-1
Fucsovics M.
Cachin P.
6-47-62