Alexander Ritschard vs Zsombor Piros — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1454Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
hard
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Ritschard A.
3-6 6-4 7-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
3672
Piros Z.
6451

Alexander Ritschard defeated Zsombor Piros 3-6 6-4 7-5 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ritschard A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ritschard A.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ritschard A.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
57
Break points saved·Even
84
84
Break points won·Clear edge
14
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
59
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ritschard A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Piros Z.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.5Hard Elo 1454
Surface ELO
7.5+175 Hard Elo edge
2.8Overall Elo 1528
ELO gap
7.2Overall Elo 1661
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d
7.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ritschard A.Piros Z.
Freshness·
—
54

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.
Ilkel C.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Escoffier A.
7-654-66-3
Virtanen O.
Stricker D.[2]
6-736-36-0
Quarter-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Broady L.[5]
3-66-37-64
Virtanen O.
Berankis R.
6-46-3
Ilkel C.
Sachko V.
6-27-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-06-3
R16
Virtanen O.
Krutykh O.
6-42-67-65
Stricker D.[2]
Onclin G.
6-36-3
Berankis R.
Grenier H.
6-41-67-5
Escoffier A.
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Ilkel C.
Ritschard A.
2-66-16-4
Sachko V.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Broady L.[5]
Herbert P.
6-16-3
Brunold M.
Brancaccio R.[4]
7-56-3
R32
Herbert P.
Copil M.
7-6110-0
Brancaccio R.[4]
Gojowczyk P.
6-11-0
Krutykh O.
Sels J.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Piros Z.
3-66-47-5
Virtanen O.
Gigante M.
6-746-36-2
Andreev A.
Bellier A.
6-747-646-3
Escoffier A.
Bergs Z.[6]
6-26-4
Broady L.[5]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Brunold M.
Guinard M.
4-66-26-2
Berankis R.
Gombos N.[3]
6-37-62
Stricker D.[2]
Collignon R.
6-42-66-2
Onclin G.
Added D.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Hemery C.
7-646-1
Ilkel C.
Klein L.[7]
6-44-67-5
Sachko V.
Paul J.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.
Brouwer G.[1]
6-27-5