Cem Ilkel vs Alexander Ritschard — Lugano CH Round of 16

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
hard
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1454Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
Ilkel C.
2-6 6-1 6-4
Ritschard A.
Ilkel C.
2662
Ritschard A.
6141

Cem Ilkel defeated Alexander Ritschard 2-6 6-1 6-4 in the Lugano CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Ritschard A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Ritschard A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Ritschard A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Ritschard A.
Clutch Rating·Even
32
36
Break points saved·Dominant
49
84
Break points won·Slight edge
3
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
40
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ritschard A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.9
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
3.8
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.
Ilkel C.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Escoffier A.
7-654-66-3
Virtanen O.
Stricker D.[2]
6-736-36-0
Quarter-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Broady L.[5]
3-66-37-64
Virtanen O.
Berankis R.
6-46-3
Ilkel C.
Sachko V.
6-27-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-06-3
R16
Virtanen O.
Krutykh O.
6-42-67-65
Stricker D.[2]
Onclin G.
6-36-3
Berankis R.
Grenier H.
6-41-67-5
Escoffier A.
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Ilkel C.
Ritschard A.
2-66-16-4
Sachko V.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Broady L.[5]
Herbert P.
6-16-3
Brunold M.
Brancaccio R.[4]
7-56-3
R32
Herbert P.
Copil M.
7-6110-0
Brancaccio R.[4]
Gojowczyk P.
6-11-0
Krutykh O.
Sels J.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Piros Z.
3-66-47-5
Virtanen O.
Gigante M.
6-746-36-2
Andreev A.
Bellier A.
6-747-646-3
Escoffier A.
Bergs Z.[6]
6-26-4
Broady L.[5]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Brunold M.
Guinard M.
4-66-26-2
Berankis R.
Gombos N.[3]
6-37-62
Stricker D.[2]
Collignon R.
6-42-66-2
Onclin G.
Added D.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Hemery C.
7-646-1
Ilkel C.
Klein L.[7]
6-44-67-5
Sachko V.
Paul J.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.
Brouwer G.[1]
6-27-5