Otto Virtanen vs Matteo Gigante — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Otto Virtanen
FIN
Otto Virtanen
#126ATP
1706ELO
1674Hard ELO
$214kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
hard
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Virtanen O.
6-7 6-3 6-2
Gigante M.
Virtanen O.
64662
Gigante M.
77321

Otto Virtanen defeated Matteo Gigante 6-7 6-3 6-2 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Otto Virtanen came in ranked #126, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Virtanen O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Virtanen O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Virtanen O.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.7
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 170). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Virtanen O.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
78
Break points won·Dominant
3
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Virtanen O.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Gigante M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+141 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1534
6.5Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Virtanen O.Gigante M.
Freshness·
80
—

Virtanen O.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.
Ilkel C.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Escoffier A.
7-654-66-3
Virtanen O.
Stricker D.[2]
6-736-36-0
Quarter-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Broady L.[5]
3-66-37-64
Virtanen O.
Berankis R.
6-46-3
Ilkel C.
Sachko V.
6-27-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-06-3
R16
Virtanen O.
Krutykh O.
6-42-67-65
Stricker D.[2]
Onclin G.
6-36-3
Berankis R.
Grenier H.
6-41-67-5
Escoffier A.
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Ilkel C.
Ritschard A.
2-66-16-4
Sachko V.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Broady L.[5]
Herbert P.
6-16-3
Brunold M.
Brancaccio R.[4]
7-56-3
R32
Herbert P.
Copil M.
7-6110-0
Brancaccio R.[4]
Gojowczyk P.
6-11-0
Krutykh O.
Sels J.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Piros Z.
3-66-47-5
Virtanen O.
Gigante M.
6-746-36-2
Andreev A.
Bellier A.
6-747-646-3
Escoffier A.
Bergs Z.[6]
6-26-4
Broady L.[5]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Brunold M.
Guinard M.
4-66-26-2
Berankis R.
Gombos N.[3]
6-37-62
Stricker D.[2]
Collignon R.
6-42-66-2
Onclin G.
Added D.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Hemery C.
7-646-1
Ilkel C.
Klein L.[7]
6-44-67-5
Sachko V.
Paul J.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.
Brouwer G.[1]
6-27-5