James Mccabe vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Puerto Vallarta CH Round of 32

Puerto Vallarta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
hard
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG4
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1419Hard ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Mccabe J.
6-3 7-6
Ficovich J.
Mccabe J.
6772
Ficovich J.
3650

James Mccabe defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-3 7-6 in the Puerto Vallarta CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: James Mccabe closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mccabe J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mccabe J.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mccabe J.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
76
Break points won·Even
9
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
12
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mccabe J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Ficovich J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+63 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1419
5.7Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1415
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
1.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mccabe J.Ficovich J.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
86

Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Paire B.[5]
Shimizu Y.
3-66-06-2
Semi-finals
Shimizu Y.
Mccabe J.
7-636-1
Paire B.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Paire B.[5]
Dougaz A.
6-36-4
Shimizu Y.
Altmaier D.[1]
3-66-46-3
Marchenko I.
Elias G.
6-746-36-0
Mccabe J.
Blanch U.
6-45-76-3
R16
Altmaier D.[1]
Ejupovic E.
6-06-1
Mccabe J.
Statham J.
2-66-16-3
Dougaz A.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-0
Elias G.
Mochizuki S.
6-32-67-65
Marchenko I.
Langmo C.
6-46-3
Paire B.[5]
Rincon D.
6-25-76-2
Shimizu Y.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Blanch U.
Fratangelo B.
6-46-2
R32
Elias G.
Mena F.[3]
6-12-0
Fratangelo B.
Bolt A.
6-26-4
Paire B.[5]
Mejia N.
6-736-17-65
Shimizu Y.
Diallo G.
4-66-37-64
Altmaier D.[1]
Koepfer D.
6-767-646-1
Yevseyev D.
Couacaud E.[2]
2-67-656-2
Mccabe J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-37-65
Dougaz A.
Trungelliti M.
6-17-61
Rincon D.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-46-2
Mochizuki S.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-56-3
Langmo C.
Choinski J.[8]
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Hong S.[7]
6-36-3
Statham J.
Shimabukuro S.
7-632-67-63
Ejupovic E.
Berrettini J.
6-47-66
Marchenko I.
Andreozzi G.
6-36-4