Nerman Fatic vs Ivan Gakhov — Antalya CH Round of 32

Antalya CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Fatic N.
7-5 6-3
Gakhov I.
Fatic N.
762
Gakhov I.
530

Nerman Fatic defeated Ivan Gakhov 7-5 6-3 in the Antalya CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
82
Break points won·Dominant
36
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 98 days (−1.5)
Gakhov I.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+94 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1384
5.8Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1430
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.8
Surface form
7.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Marozsan F.[2]
Ofner S.[1]
7-56-0
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[1]
Mager G.
7-667-64
Marozsan F.[2]
Kopriva V.[4]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Marozsan F.[2]
Michalski D.
1-66-16-2
Mager G.
Fatic N.
6-41-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Geerts M.
6-727-56-1
Ofner S.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-46-1
R16
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-43-66-4
Michalski D.
Ionel N.[8]
6-06-3
Geerts M.
Caruso S.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Cobolli F.[3]
6-06-3
Marozsan F.[2]
Giannessi A.
7-656-2
Kopriva V.[4]
Diez S.
6-26-0
Coppejans K.
Kolar Z.[5]
3-66-37-63
Ofner S.[1]
Valkusz M.
4-67-57-65
R32
Marozsan F.[2]
Zekic M.
6-17-5
Giannessi A.
Gerch L.
7-646-1
Michalski D.
Domingues J.
4-66-06-0
Ionel N.[8]
Roca Batalla O.
7-636-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Travaglia S.
6-746-36-4
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
7-56-3
Cobolli F.[3]
Basic M.
3-66-27-64
Valkusz M.
Kirkin E.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[1]
Erel Y.
7-56-2
Geerts M.
Tu L.[7]
6-706-06-2
Caruso S.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-786-46-2
Diez S.
Gaubas V.
7-56-3
Mager G.
Neumayer L.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ferrari G.
6-26-3
Kolar Z.[5]
Erhard M.
6-16-3