Kimmer Coppejans vs Zdenek Kolar — Antalya CH Round of 16

Antalya CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
clay
Zdenek Kolar
CZE5
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Coppejans K.
3-6 6-3 7-6
Kolar Z.
Coppejans K.
36772
Kolar Z.
63631

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Zdenek Kolar 3-6 6-3 7-6 in the Antalya CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Kimmer Coppejans came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Kimmer Coppejans extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-08-26US OpenQ2hardKimmer Coppejans7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
53
Break points won·Even
29
28
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kolar Z.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1+29 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Clay Elo 1485
5.3Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1506
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
6.3
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Kolar Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
90

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Marozsan F.[2]
Ofner S.[1]
7-56-0
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[1]
Mager G.
7-667-64
Marozsan F.[2]
Kopriva V.[4]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Marozsan F.[2]
Michalski D.
1-66-16-2
Mager G.
Fatic N.
6-41-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Geerts M.
6-727-56-1
Ofner S.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-46-1
R16
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-43-66-4
Michalski D.
Ionel N.[8]
6-06-3
Geerts M.
Caruso S.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Cobolli F.[3]
6-06-3
Marozsan F.[2]
Giannessi A.
7-656-2
Kopriva V.[4]
Diez S.
6-26-0
Coppejans K.
Kolar Z.[5]
3-66-37-63
Ofner S.[1]
Valkusz M.
4-67-57-65
R32
Marozsan F.[2]
Zekic M.
6-17-5
Giannessi A.
Gerch L.
7-646-1
Michalski D.
Domingues J.
4-66-06-0
Ionel N.[8]
Roca Batalla O.
7-636-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Travaglia S.
6-746-36-4
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
7-56-3
Cobolli F.[3]
Basic M.
3-66-27-64
Valkusz M.
Kirkin E.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[1]
Erel Y.
7-56-2
Geerts M.
Tu L.[7]
6-706-06-2
Caruso S.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-786-46-2
Diez S.
Gaubas V.
7-56-3
Mager G.
Neumayer L.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ferrari G.
6-26-3
Kolar Z.[5]
Erhard M.
6-16-3