Facundo Bagnis vs Hernan Casanova — Santiago CH Round of 16

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG3
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Bagnis F.
6-2 6-3
Casanova H.
Bagnis F.
662
Casanova H.
230

Facundo Bagnis defeated Hernan Casanova 6-2 6-3 in the Santiago CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Hernan Casanova came in ranked #337, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
64%
76%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
0.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 115). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
8
Break points saved·Dominant
92
24
Break points won·Clear edge
35
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Casanova H.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+203 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Clay Elo 1381
7.4Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1393
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.0
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Casanova H.
Freshness·
—
70

Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
3-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Dellien H.[4]
Olivieri G.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
7-626-3
Quarter-finals
Dellien H.[4]
Agamenone F.[7]
6-757-637-65
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Darderi L.
6-07-5
Olivieri G.
Gaio F.
6-36-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Bagnis F.[3]
3-66-16-0
R16
Olivieri G.
Bonadio R.
7-666-2
Gaio F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
6-45-76-4
Agamenone F.[7]
Burruchaga R.
3-66-26-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Bueno G.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[3]
Casanova H.
6-26-3
Darderi L.
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-37-5
Dellien H.[4]
Vavassori A.
7-54-67-62
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Gaston H.
7-56-3
R32
Bonadio R.
Cecchinato M.[2]
7-646-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Villalon N.
6-16-0
Dellien H.[4]
Pellegrino A.
6-34-66-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Cerundolo J.[5]
6-36-4
Darderi L.
Lama G.
7-657-61
Reis Da Silva J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
4-67-644-2
Gaston H.
Delbonis F.
6-44-66-3
Olivieri G.
Lopez San Martin A.
7-666-4
Bagnis F.[3]
Kuzuhara B.
6-06-1
Gaio F.
Olivo R.
6-756-46-1
Vavassori A.
Tirante T.
6-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Navone M.
6-06-4
Agamenone F.[7]
Torres J.
6-36-756-3
Casanova H.
Villanueva G.
6-06-1
Bagnis F.
Kuzuhara B.
6-06-1
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Kicker N.
6-36-3
Bueno G.
Barrios Vera T.
7-52-66-1