Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Nicolas Kicker — Santiago CH Round of 32

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG8
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#110ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Diaz Acosta F.
6-3 6-3
Kicker N.
Diaz Acosta F.
662
Kicker N.
330

Facundo Diaz Acosta defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-3 6-3 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Diaz Acosta came in ranked #110.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diaz Acosta F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Diaz Acosta F.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diaz Acosta F.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
30
Break points saved·Dominant
89
56
Break points won·Clear edge
33
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diaz Acosta F.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Kicker N.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.1+295 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Clay Elo 1373
8.0Overall Elo 1681
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1385
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.4
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diaz Acosta F.Kicker N.
Freshness·Dominant
53
100

Diaz Acosta F.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
3-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Dellien H.[4]
Olivieri G.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
7-626-3
Quarter-finals
Dellien H.[4]
Agamenone F.[7]
6-757-637-65
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Darderi L.
6-07-5
Olivieri G.
Gaio F.
6-36-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Bagnis F.[3]
3-66-16-0
R16
Olivieri G.
Bonadio R.
7-666-2
Gaio F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
6-45-76-4
Agamenone F.[7]
Burruchaga R.
3-66-26-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Bueno G.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[3]
Casanova H.
6-26-3
Darderi L.
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-37-5
Dellien H.[4]
Vavassori A.
7-54-67-62
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Gaston H.
7-56-3
R32
Bonadio R.
Cecchinato M.[2]
7-646-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Villalon N.
6-16-0
Dellien H.[4]
Pellegrino A.
6-34-66-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Cerundolo J.[5]
6-36-4
Darderi L.
Lama G.
7-657-61
Reis Da Silva J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
4-67-644-2
Gaston H.
Delbonis F.
6-44-66-3
Olivieri G.
Lopez San Martin A.
7-666-4
Bagnis F.[3]
Kuzuhara B.
6-06-1
Gaio F.
Olivo R.
6-756-46-1
Vavassori A.
Tirante T.
6-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Navone M.
6-06-4
Agamenone F.[7]
Torres J.
6-36-756-3
Casanova H.
Villanueva G.
6-06-1
Bagnis F.
Kuzuhara B.
6-06-1
Diaz Acosta F.[8]
Kicker N.
6-36-3
Bueno G.
Barrios Vera T.
7-52-66-1