Max Purcell vs Sasi Kumar Mukund — Pune CH Round of 32

Pune CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS3
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 February 2023
hard
IND
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Purcell M.
3-6 6-3 6-0
Mukund S.
Purcell M.
3662
Mukund S.
6301

Max Purcell defeated Sasi Kumar Mukund 3-6 6-3 6-0 in the Pune CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Mukund S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Mukund S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.5
6.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Mukund S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
0
Break points saved·Dominant
92
20
Break points won·Slight edge
10
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mukund S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
10.0
Surface form
4.6
10.010-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
5.3
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[3]
Nardi L.[4]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[3]
Zekic M.
6-26-3
Nardi L.[4]
Palan D.
7-641-67-5
Quarter-finals
Zekic M.
Mayot H.
6-26-4
Purcell M.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-06-2
Palan D.
Tseng C.[2]
7-641-66-3
Nardi L.[4]
Noguchi R.[8]
6-36-0
R16
Mayot H.
Neuchrist M.
6-40-0
Palan D.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-4
Nardi L.[4]
Giustino L.
6-7116-06-4
Noguchi R.[8]
Milojevic N.
2-67-56-3
Maestrelli F.
Sweeny D.
6-726-37-5
Purcell M.[3]
Kuzmanov D.
6-26-4
Zekic M.
Duckworth J.[1]
4-66-47-62
Tseng C.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-46-4
R32
Tseng C.[2]
Santillan A.
4-67-56-4
Zekic M.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[3]
Mukund S.
3-66-36-0
Kuzmanov D.
Ochi M.
5-77-616-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Gengel M.
4-66-27-61
Medjedovic H.
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[4]
Lock B.
6-17-5
Giustino L.
Ly N.
6-16-1
Milojevic N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-717-656-4
Maestrelli F.
Polmans M.
1-66-16-2
Sweeny D.
Clarke J.
6-06-2
Neuchrist M.
Kadhe A.
6-27-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-756-26-3
Mayot H.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-16-1
Nagal S.
Uchiyama Y.
7-634-66-4
Palan D.
Svrcina D.[6]
6-47-64