Yannick Hanfmann vs Pedro Martinez — Santiago Round of 32

Santiago · ATP · Round of 32
Yannick Hanfmann
GER
Yannick Hanfmann
#51ATP
1781ELO
1741Clay ELO
$596kYTD
$4.5MCAREER
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 February 2023
clay
Pedro Martinez
ESP
Pedro Martinez
#157ATP
1580ELO
1550Clay ELO
$335kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWW
Hanfmann Y.
6-2 6-0
Martinez P.
Hanfmann Y.
662
Martinez P.
200

Yannick Hanfmann defeated Pedro Martinez 6-2 6-0 in the Santiago round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Yannick Hanfmann came in ranked #51, defending last year's quarter-final. Yannick Hanfmann extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-09-18ChengduQFhardYannick Hanfmann7-6(1) 6-2
2022-02-21SantiagoQFclayPedro Martinez6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Hanfmann Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Martinez P.

Martinez P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Hanfmann Y.

Serve advantage — Hanfmann Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Hanfmann Y.Martinez P.
61
Serve
5
39
Return
41

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Hanfmann Y.Martinez P.
1st serve in·Even
67%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.5
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hanfmann Y.Martinez P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
61
66
Break points saved·Even
95
94
Break points won·Clear edge
26
41
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
42
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hanfmann Y.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Martinez P.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+191 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1550
7.2Overall Elo 1781
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1580
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.2
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
8.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hanfmann Y.Martinez P.
Freshness·Clear edge
92
79

Hanfmann Y.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Martinez P.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
30°CClear
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 17%
Final
Jarry N.
Etcheverry T.
6-757-656-2
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.
Baez S.[3]
7-56-3
Jarry N.
Munar J.
1-67-646-1
Quarter-finals
Jarry N.
Hanfmann Y.
3-66-36-4
Baez S.[3]
Djere L.[6]
7-646-4
Etcheverry T.
Lajovic D.
6-16-2
Munar J.
Monteiro T.
6-33-66-2
R16
Baez S.[3]
Garin C.
6-46-3
Lajovic D.
Cerundolo J.
6-22-67-62
Etcheverry T.
Cerundolo F.[2]
6-33-66-3
Munar J.
Musetti L.[1]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.
Cecchinato M.
3-66-36-2
Jarry N.
Schwartzman D.[4]
6-44-67-62
Hanfmann Y.
Carballes Baena R.
7-666-2
Djere L.[6]
Bonadio R.
7-57-5
R32
Munar J.
Tabilo A.
6-06-747-65
Carballes Baena R.
Taberner C.
6-10-0
Garin C.
Thiem D.
6-27-62
Lajovic D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-3
Cerundolo J.
Cachin P.[7]
6-43-66-3
Etcheverry T.
Fognini F.
6-17-61
Monteiro T.
Ramos A.[5]
7-54-67-5
Djere L.[6]
Sousa J.
6-36-2
Bonadio R.
Galan D.
6-37-65
Cecchinato M.
Bagnis F.
6-23-67-63
Jarry N.
Varillas J.
7-616-4
Hanfmann Y.
Martinez P.
6-26-0