Lorenzo Giustino vs Nam Hoang Ly — Pune CH Round of 32

Pune CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lorenzo Giustino
ITA
Lorenzo Giustino
#196ATP
1420ELO
1426Hard ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 February 2023
hard
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Giustino L.
6-1 6-1
Ly N.
Giustino L.
662
Ly N.
110

Lorenzo Giustino defeated Nam Hoang Ly 6-1 6-1 in the Pune CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Giustino L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Ly N.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Giustino L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giustino L.Ly N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (162 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giustino L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ly N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
7.2
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Giustino L.Ly N.
Freshness·
51
—

Giustino L.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[3]
Nardi L.[4]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[3]
Zekic M.
6-26-3
Nardi L.[4]
Palan D.
7-641-67-5
Quarter-finals
Zekic M.
Mayot H.
6-26-4
Purcell M.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-06-2
Palan D.
Tseng C.[2]
7-641-66-3
Nardi L.[4]
Noguchi R.[8]
6-36-0
R16
Mayot H.
Neuchrist M.
6-40-0
Palan D.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-4
Nardi L.[4]
Giustino L.
6-7116-06-4
Noguchi R.[8]
Milojevic N.
2-67-56-3
Maestrelli F.
Sweeny D.
6-726-37-5
Purcell M.[3]
Kuzmanov D.
6-26-4
Zekic M.
Duckworth J.[1]
4-66-47-62
Tseng C.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-46-4
R32
Tseng C.[2]
Santillan A.
4-67-56-4
Zekic M.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[3]
Mukund S.
3-66-36-0
Kuzmanov D.
Ochi M.
5-77-616-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Gengel M.
4-66-27-61
Medjedovic H.
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[4]
Lock B.
6-17-5
Giustino L.
Ly N.
6-16-1
Milojevic N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-717-656-4
Maestrelli F.
Polmans M.
1-66-16-2
Sweeny D.
Clarke J.
6-06-2
Neuchrist M.
Kadhe A.
6-27-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-756-26-3
Mayot H.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-16-1
Nagal S.
Uchiyama Y.
7-634-66-4
Palan D.
Svrcina D.[6]
6-47-64