Caroline Garcia vs Nuria Parrizas Diaz — Monterrey Round of 16

Monterrey · WTA · Round of 16
FRA1
Caroline Garcia
#772WTA
32 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 February 2023
hard
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
ESP
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
#626WTA
1398ELO
1400Hard ELO
34 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Garcia C.
6-3 6-2
Parrizas Diaz N.
Garcia C.
662
Parrizas Diaz N.
320

Caroline Garcia defeated Nuria Parrizas Diaz 6-3 6-2 in the Monterrey round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nuria Parrizas Diaz came in ranked #626, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Garcia C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Parrizas Diaz N.

Parrizas Diaz N.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Garcia C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Garcia C.Parrizas Diaz N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
71%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Garcia C.Parrizas Diaz N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
34
Break points saved·Dominant
91
36
Break points won·Dominant
50
79
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Garcia C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Parrizas Diaz N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
7.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
29°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 32%

Draw

Final
Vekic D.[3]
Garcia C.[1]
6-43-67-5
Semi-finals
Garcia C.[1]
Mertens E.[4]
6-36-4
Vekic D.[3]
Zhu L.[5]
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Vekic D.[3]
Bonaventure Y.
6-25-77-65
Garcia C.[1]
Sherif M.[7]
6-06-4
Mertens E.[4]
Cocciaretto E.[8]
6-26-2
Zhu L.[5]
Dolehide C.
6-36-2
R16
Dolehide C.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-4
Zhu L.[5]
Marino R.
7-642-66-3
Bonaventure Y.
Rakhimova K.
7-621-66-3
Cocciaretto E.[8]
Maria T.
7-657-63
Sherif M.[7]
Wang X.
3-67-666-4
Garcia C.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-36-2
Mertens E.[4]
Ruse E.
6-33-66-2
Vekic D.[3]
Navarro E.
6-36-2
R32
Sherif M.[7]
Osorio C.
7-654-2
Vekic D.[3]
Tsurenko L.
2-65-0
Maria T.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-0
Navarro E.
Jeanjean L.
6-46-2
Wang X.
Vickery S.
6-36-4
Rakhimova K.
Siniakova K.[6]
7-662-67-65
Marino R.
Contreras Gomez F.
7-647-64
Dolehide C.
Niemeier J.
6-16-0
Garcia C.[1]
Juvan K.
6-36-4
Cocciaretto E.[8]
Bassols Ribera M.
7-56-2
Zhu L.[5]
Bondar A.
6-47-64
Mertens E.[4]
Shnaider D.
6-06-4
Ruse E.
Giorgi C.
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Wang X.
7-652-66-4
Bonaventure Y.
Papamichail D.
7-654-66-1
Schmiedlova A.
Bouzkova M.[2]
6-46-2