Zachary Svajda vs Coleman Wong — Rome GA CH Round of 32

Rome GA CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zachary Svajda
USA
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
HKG
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Svajda Z.
6-3 6-1
Wong C.
Svajda Z.
662
Wong C.
310

Zachary Svajda defeated Coleman Wong 6-3 6-1 in the Rome GA CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Zachary Svajda extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-01WimbledonQ1grassZachary Svajda6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Svajda Z.Wong C.
30
Serve
37
12
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
8.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
43
Break points saved·Even
89
91
Break points won·Dominant
66
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Wong C.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 91 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.5+97 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1593
5.3Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1602
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Wong C.
Freshness·Even
86
89

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[1]
Michelsen A.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[1]
Svajda Z.
7-637-65
Michelsen A.
Hong S.[8]
4-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Hong S.[8]
Kodat T.
4-66-36-4
Michelsen A.
Leshem E.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.
Ejupovic E.
6-13-66-3
Thompson J.[1]
Gray A.
6-46-2
Hong S.
Kodat T.
4-66-36-4
R16
Ejupovic E.
Harrison R.
3-67-656-2
Michelsen A.
Moraing M.
6-743-1
Svajda Z.
Vukic A.[3]
6-36-3
Kodat T.
Shimabukuro S.
6-43-67-5
Gray A.
Kypson P.
7-636-3
Thompson J.[1]
Squire H.
6-46-1
Hong S.[8]
Decamps G.
6-16-0
Leshem E.
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Shimabukuro S.
6-43-67-5
R32
Ejupovic E.
Sandgren T.[6]
6-43-2
Kodat T.
Couacaud E.[4]
6-46-3
Vukic A.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Moraing M.
Harrison C.
1-66-46-3
Svajda Z.
Wong C.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Rincon D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Koepfer D.[7]
6-36-1
Ponwith N.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-756-3
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-17-64
Shimabukuro S.
Fanselow S.
2-66-36-3
Harrison R.
Marchenko I.
6-33-66-3
Gray A.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-46-4
Leshem E.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Decamps G.
Cukierman D.
6-16-2
Kodat T.
Couacaud E.
6-46-3