Harold Mayot vs Dane Sweeny — Bengaluru CH Round of 32

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Mayot H.
3-6 6-1 6-4
Sweeny D.
Mayot H.
3662
Sweeny D.
6141

Harold Mayot defeated Dane Sweeny 3-6 6-1 6-4 in the Bengaluru CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayot H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayot H.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayot H.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
69
Break points won·Slight edge
22
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayot H.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Sweeny D.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+104 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1444
6.0Overall Elo 1571
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1460
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
4.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayot H.Sweeny D.
Freshness·Even
100
98

Mayot H.: 15 days rest · Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Medjedovic H.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Mayot H.
6-37-64
Medjedovic H.
Tseng C.[1]
6-16-2
Purcell M.
Nardi L.[5]
6-26-0
R16
Mayot H.
Peniston R.[3]
7-656-0
Tseng C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Polmans M.
7-57-5
Nardi L.[5]
Jung J.
7-55-76-2
Purcell M.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-35-76-4
R32
Polmans M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Svrcina D.[7]
7-56-2
Nardi L.[5]
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-746-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Neuchrist M.
3-67-56-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-46-1
Peniston R.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Mayot H.
Sweeny D.
3-66-16-4
Mccabe J.
Giustino L.
6-27-63
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[4]
7-663-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-636-1
Jung J.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Nagal S.
Ly N.
7-635-76-4