James Mccabe vs Harold Mayot — Bengaluru CH Quarter-final

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
Mccabe J.
6-3 7-6
Mayot H.
Mccabe J.
6772
Mayot H.
3640

James Mccabe defeated Harold Mayot 6-3 7-6 in the Bengaluru CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: James Mccabe closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mccabe J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Mayot H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mccabe J.Mayot H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mccabe J.Mayot H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
37
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
92
Break points won·Clear edge
9
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
32
Tiebreaks·Even
12
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mccabe J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mayot H.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1481
Surface ELO
6.4+67 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1571
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mccabe J.Mayot H.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
100

Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Mayot H.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Medjedovic H.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Mayot H.
6-37-64
Medjedovic H.
Tseng C.[1]
6-16-2
Purcell M.
Nardi L.[5]
6-26-0
R16
Mayot H.
Peniston R.[3]
7-656-0
Tseng C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Polmans M.
7-57-5
Nardi L.[5]
Jung J.
7-55-76-2
Purcell M.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-35-76-4
R32
Polmans M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Svrcina D.[7]
7-56-2
Nardi L.[5]
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-746-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Neuchrist M.
3-67-56-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-46-1
Peniston R.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Mayot H.
Sweeny D.
3-66-16-4
Mccabe J.
Giustino L.
6-27-63
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[4]
7-663-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-636-1
Jung J.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Nagal S.
Ly N.
7-635-76-4