Sumit Nagal vs Nam Hoang Ly — Bengaluru CH Round of 32

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Nagal S.
7-6 5-7 6-4
Ly N.
Nagal S.
77562
Ly N.
63741

Sumit Nagal defeated Nam Hoang Ly 7-6 5-7 6-4 in the Bengaluru CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Ly N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Ly N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ly N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Ly N.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Medjedovic H.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Mayot H.
6-37-64
Medjedovic H.
Tseng C.[1]
6-16-2
Purcell M.
Nardi L.[5]
6-26-0
R16
Mayot H.
Peniston R.[3]
7-656-0
Tseng C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Polmans M.
7-57-5
Nardi L.[5]
Jung J.
7-55-76-2
Purcell M.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-35-76-4
R32
Polmans M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Svrcina D.[7]
7-56-2
Nardi L.[5]
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-746-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Neuchrist M.
3-67-56-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-46-1
Peniston R.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Mayot H.
Sweeny D.
3-66-16-4
Mccabe J.
Giustino L.
6-27-63
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[4]
7-663-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-636-1
Jung J.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Nagal S.
Ly N.
7-635-76-4