Edan Leshem vs Nathan Ponwith — Rome GA CH Round of 16

Rome GA CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ISR
Edan Leshem
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
USA
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Leshem E.
6-3 6-2
Ponwith N.
Leshem E.
662
Ponwith N.
320

Edan Leshem defeated Nathan Ponwith 6-3 6-2 in the Rome GA CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Leshem E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Ponwith N.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Leshem E.

Serve advantage — Leshem E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Leshem E.Ponwith N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Leshem E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ponwith N.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[1]
Michelsen A.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[1]
Svajda Z.
7-637-65
Michelsen A.
Hong S.[8]
4-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Hong S.[8]
Kodat T.
4-66-36-4
Michelsen A.
Leshem E.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.
Ejupovic E.
6-13-66-3
Thompson J.[1]
Gray A.
6-46-2
Hong S.
Kodat T.
4-66-36-4
R16
Ejupovic E.
Harrison R.
3-67-656-2
Michelsen A.
Moraing M.
6-743-1
Svajda Z.
Vukic A.[3]
6-36-3
Kodat T.
Shimabukuro S.
6-43-67-5
Gray A.
Kypson P.
7-636-3
Thompson J.[1]
Squire H.
6-46-1
Hong S.[8]
Decamps G.
6-16-0
Leshem E.
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Shimabukuro S.
6-43-67-5
R32
Ejupovic E.
Sandgren T.[6]
6-43-2
Kodat T.
Couacaud E.[4]
6-46-3
Vukic A.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Moraing M.
Harrison C.
1-66-46-3
Svajda Z.
Wong C.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Rincon D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Koepfer D.[7]
6-36-1
Ponwith N.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-756-3
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-17-64
Shimabukuro S.
Fanselow S.
2-66-36-3
Harrison R.
Marchenko I.
6-33-66-3
Gray A.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-46-4
Leshem E.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Decamps G.
Cukierman D.
6-16-2
Kodat T.
Couacaud E.
6-46-3