Edan Leshem vs Nathan Ponwith — Rome GA CH Round of 16
Rome GA CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
4.8
Surface form4.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Leshem E.
662
Ponwith N.
320
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form67%1st serve in+8%59%
66%1st serve points won+3%63%
47%2nd serve points won+7%54%
60%Service points won+1%59%
40%Return points won+5%35%
56%Break points saved56%
1.4Aces / match+0.82.2
2.4Double faults / match+0.22.6
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (8 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Svajda Z.
Ejupovic E.
6-13-66-3
Thompson J.[1]
Gray A.
6-46-2
Michelsen A.
Leshem E.
7-56-3
Hong S.[8]
Kodat T.
4-66-36-4
R16
Ejupovic E.
Harrison R.
3-67-656-2
Gray A.
Kypson P.
7-636-3
Svajda Z.
Vukic A.[3]
6-36-3
Thompson J.[1]
Squire H.
6-46-1
Hong S.[8]
Decamps G.
6-16-0
Leshem E.
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Shimabukuro S.
6-43-67-5
Michelsen A.
Moraing M.
6-743-1
R32
Kodat T.
Couacaud E.[4]
6-46-3
Vukic A.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Thompson J.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Koepfer D.[7]
6-36-1
Ponwith N.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-756-3
Ejupovic E.
Sandgren T.[6]
6-43-2
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-17-64
Shimabukuro S.
Fanselow S.
2-66-36-3
Harrison R.
Marchenko I.
6-33-66-3
Gray A.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-46-4
Leshem E.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Svajda Z.
Wong C.
6-36-1
Decamps G.
Cukierman D.
6-16-2
Squire H.
Rincon D.
6-46-2
Moraing M.
Harrison C.
1-66-46-3