Mitchell Krueger vs Bernard Tomic — Monterrey CH Quarter-final

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Krueger M.
6-4 2-1
Tomic B.
Krueger M.
62–
Tomic B.
41–

Mitchell Krueger advanced when Bernard Tomic retired 6-4 2-1 in the Monterrey CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
92
Break points won·Slight edge
14
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 224 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1436
Surface ELO
5.1+6 Hard Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
1.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Tomic B.
Freshness·Even
87
84

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Gojo B.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Borges N.[6]
Krueger M.
7-637-63
Gojo B.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.
Tomic B.
6-42-1
Borges N.[6]
Altmaier D.[4]
7-626-4
Gojo B.
Kovacevic A.
7-653-66-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Kudla D.[3]
3-67-636-2
R16
Krueger M.
Andreozzi G.
6-32-1
Tomic B.
Gomez E.[2]
4-66-47-64
Kudla D.[3]
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Marterer M.
7-616-3
Borges N.[6]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[8]
Paire B.
7-626-1
Gojo B.
Daniel T.[7]
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.
Mejia N.
6-36-2
R32
Zhu E.
Wu T.
7-625-76-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Holt B.
7-646-3
Gomez E.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-666-4
Tomic B.
Ficovich J.
7-636-1
Borges N.[6]
Klahn B.
6-26-2
Mejia N.
Mansouri S.
6-41-66-3
Marterer M.
Elias G.
6-36-4
Gojo B.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-37-63
Kovacevic A.
Mannarino A.[1]
7-57-64
Chappell N.
Flores J.
6-36-2
Paire B.
Escobedo E.
2-66-26-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Van Deinse J.
6-06-1
Andreozzi G.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Diez S.
6-45-76-4
Daniel T.[7]
Johnson S.
6-43-66-3
Kudla D.[3]
Bellucci M.
6-26-4