Strong Kirchheimer vs Luke Johnson — Rome GA CH Qualifying Round 1

Rome GA CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Strong Kirchheimer
USA4
Strong Kirchheimer
#660ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
GBR
Luke Johnson
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL
Kirchheimer S.
6-3 6-3
Johnson L.
Kirchheimer S.
662
Johnson L.
330

Strong Kirchheimer defeated Luke Johnson 6-3 6-3 in the Rome GA CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kirchheimer S.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Johnson L.

Johnson L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kirchheimer S.

Serve advantage — Johnson L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kirchheimer S.Johnson L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
63%
42%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kirchheimer S.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Johnson L.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 105 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
1.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kirchheimer S.Johnson L.
Freshness·
78
—

Kirchheimer S.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Kodat T.
Martin A.[10]
7-56-4
Smith K.[3]
Young D.
6-46-3
Fanselow S.[2]
Rodenas P.
6-36-2
Wong C.
Kirchheimer S.[4]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[8]
Rybakov A.[1]
4-67-637-5
Kodat T.
Martin A.
7-56-4
Q1
Kodat T.
Perez A.[5]
6-36-2
Fanselow S.[2]
Hohmann R.
6-44-66-2
Rybakov A.[1]
Williams C.
4-66-16-2
Smith K.[3]
Sigouin B.
6-36-4
Wong C.
Brymer G.[7]
4-66-36-0
Kirchheimer S.[4]
Johnson L.
6-36-3
Hazawa S.[6]
Johns G.
5-76-46-4
Young D.
Pannu K.[11]
5-76-26-2
Kypson P.[8]
Chopra K.
6-36-4
Kodat T.
Perez A.
6-36-2
Martin A.[10]
Markes C.
5-0
Rodenas P.
Mccormick T.
6-36-4
Rodenas P.
Mccormick T.[12]
6-36-4