Chun Hsin Tseng vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Bengaluru CH Round of 16

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE1
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Tseng C.
6-2 5-7 7-6
Hsu Y.
Tseng C.
65772
Hsu Y.
27641

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-2 5-7 7-6 in the Bengaluru CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng closed it out in three sets, 6–2 5–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 169). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
74
Break points won·Slight edge
15
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
31
50
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Hsu Y.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9+27 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.1Hard Elo 1468
5.1Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1489
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.4
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Medjedovic H.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Mayot H.
6-37-64
Medjedovic H.
Tseng C.[1]
6-16-2
Purcell M.
Nardi L.[5]
6-26-0
R16
Mayot H.
Peniston R.[3]
7-656-0
Tseng C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Polmans M.
7-57-5
Nardi L.[5]
Jung J.
7-55-76-2
Purcell M.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-35-76-4
R32
Polmans M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Svrcina D.[7]
7-56-2
Nardi L.[5]
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-746-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Neuchrist M.
3-67-56-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-46-1
Peniston R.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Mayot H.
Sweeny D.
3-66-16-4
Mccabe J.
Giustino L.
6-27-63
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[4]
7-663-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-636-1
Jung J.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Nagal S.
Ly N.
7-635-76-4