Borna Gojo vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez — Monterrey CH Round of 32

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
MEX
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
#323ATP
1527ELO
1487Hard ELO
21 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Gojo B.
6-3 7-6
Pacheco Mendez R.
Gojo B.
6772
Pacheco Mendez R.
3630

Borna Gojo defeated Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 6-3 7-6 in the Monterrey CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Borna Gojo closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Pacheco Mendez R.

Pacheco Mendez R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Pacheco Mendez R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Pacheco Mendez R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
81
Break points won·Slight edge
10
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Pacheco Mendez R.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 203 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.2+175 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1487
6.9Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1527
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
2.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Pacheco Mendez R.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
87

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Pacheco Mendez R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Gojo B.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Borges N.[6]
Krueger M.
7-637-63
Gojo B.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.
Tomic B.
6-42-1
Borges N.[6]
Altmaier D.[4]
7-626-4
Gojo B.
Kovacevic A.
7-653-66-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Kudla D.[3]
3-67-636-2
R16
Krueger M.
Andreozzi G.
6-32-1
Tomic B.
Gomez E.[2]
4-66-47-64
Kudla D.[3]
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Marterer M.
7-616-3
Borges N.[6]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[8]
Paire B.
7-626-1
Gojo B.
Daniel T.[7]
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.
Mejia N.
6-36-2
R32
Zhu E.
Wu T.
7-625-76-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Holt B.
7-646-3
Gomez E.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-666-4
Tomic B.
Ficovich J.
7-636-1
Borges N.[6]
Klahn B.
6-26-2
Mejia N.
Mansouri S.
6-41-66-3
Marterer M.
Elias G.
6-36-4
Gojo B.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-37-63
Kovacevic A.
Mannarino A.[1]
7-57-64
Chappell N.
Flores J.
6-36-2
Paire B.
Escobedo E.
2-66-26-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Van Deinse J.
6-06-1
Andreozzi G.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Diez S.
6-45-76-4
Daniel T.[7]
Johnson S.
6-43-66-3
Kudla D.[3]
Bellucci M.
6-26-4